Skip to main content
Log in

Scientometrics: State-of-the-art

  • Future Perspectives
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this presentation we argue that the core research activities of scientometries fall in four interrelated areas: science and technology indicators, information systems on science and technology, the interaction between science and technology, and cognitive as well as socioorganisational structures in science and technology.

We emphasize that an essential condition for the healthy development of the field is a careful balance between application and basic work, in which the applied side is the driving force. In other words: scientometrics is primarily a field of applied science. This means that the interaction users' is at least as important as the interaction with colleague-scientists. We state that this situation is very stimulating, it strengthens methodology and it activates basic work. We consider idea of scientometrics lacking theoretical content or being otherwise in a 'crisis-like' situation groundless.

Scientometrics is in a typical developmental stage in which the creativity of its individual researchers and the ‘climate’ and facilities of their institutional environments determine the Progress in the field and, particularly, its relation with other disciplines. These aspects also contribute substantially to the reputation of scientometrics as a research field respected by the broader scientific community. And this latter point is important, both to let quantitative studies of science and technology take more advantage of an academic environment, as well as to keep it innovative and thus attractive in terms of applications at the longer term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Scientometric indicator datafiles. A multidimensional machine readable database for evaluative purposes.Scientometrics, 28 (1993) 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. F. J. van Raan, Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises,Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Egghe, Bridging the gaps: Conceptual discussions on informetrics,Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Narin, K. S. Hamilton, D. Olwastro,Linkage between agency-supported research and patented industrial technology, Research Evaluation, (1996) to be published.

  5. G. Lewison, Publications from the European Community's Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP): Multi-nationality, acknowledgement of support, and citations,Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. F. Moed, R. E. De Bruin, Th. N. Van Leeuwen, New bibliometric tools for the assessment national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications,Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Gabolde, Opening address to the First Int. Conf. on the Evaluation of Research, Technology Development,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 317–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. N. Kostoff, Federal research impact assessment: Axioms, approaches, applications,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 163–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Cozzens, U. S. research assessment: Recent developments,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. A. Smith, Evaluating research, technology and development in Canadian industry: Meeting challenges of industrial innovation,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 527–539.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin, Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ….. and beyond?Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. E. Roosendaal, Roles of bibliometrics in scientific communication,Research Evaluation, (1996) to be published.

  13. R. J. W. TIijssen, A. F. J. Van Raan, Mapping changes in science and technology: bibliometric cooccurrence analysis of the R&D literature.Evaluation Review, 18 (1994) 98–115.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Glänzel, The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology,Scientometrics, (1996) 167-176.

  15. H. F. Moed, Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers: A first overview,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. S. Katz, Bibliometric standards: Personal experience and lessons learned,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Debackere, B. Clarysse, Advanced bibliometric methods to model the relationship between entry-behavior and networking in emerging technological communities,Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), (1996) to be published.

  18. H. Moxham, J. Anderson, Peer review: a view from the inside,Science and Technology Policy, (1992) 7–15.

  19. A. J. Nederhof, E. C. M. Noyons, International comparison of departments' research performance the humanities,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), 43 (1992) 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Zitt, F. Perrot, R. Barre, The transition from ‘national’ to ‘transnational’ model and related measures of countries' performance,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), (1996) to be published.

  21. H. Grupp, U. Schmoch, K. Koschatzky, Science and technology infrastructure in Baden-Württemberg and its orientation toward future regional development,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), (1996) to be published.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Raan, A.F.J. Scientometrics: State-of-the-art. Scientometrics 38, 205–218 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461131

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461131

Keywords

Navigation