Skip to main content
Log in

Scientometric studies on chemistry II: Aims and methods of producing new chemical substances

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemistry, as today's most active science, has increased its substances exponentially during the past 200 years without saturation. To get more insight why and how chemists produce new substances, a content analysis of 300 communications to theAngewandte Chemie of the years 1980, 1990, and 1995 is carried out regarding aims and methods of preparative research. In the most productive field of organic chemistry production mainly occurs to improve abilities for further production, while the less productive field of inorganic chemistry has more diverse aims. Methodological differences between organic and inorganic chemistry are discussed in detail as well as the relationship between pure and applied science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braun, T., Bujdosó, E., Lyon, W. S., An analytical look at chemical publications,Analytical Chemistry, 52 (1980) 617A-629A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., The sweet and the sour of Journal Citation Rates,The Chemical Intelligencer, 1 (1995) 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, H., Editorial,Angewandte Chemie, 107 (1995) 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical Abstract Service,CAS Statistical Summary 1907–1995, Columbus/Ohio 1996.

  • Daniel, H.-D., Evaluation des Peer-Review-Verfahrens bei der Angewandten Chemie,Angewandte Chemie, 105 (1993a) 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, H.-D.,Guardians of Science, Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review, VCH, Weinheim, 1993b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grissom, A., The highest-impact, highest-influence chemistry, journals,The Scientist, April 1 (1991) 14.

  • Hierppe, R.,A Bibliography of Bibliometrics and Citation Indexing & Analysis, The Royal Institute of Technology-Library, Stockholm, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreitzenbacher, H. L., Thurmair, M., Textvergleich als Grundlage zur Beschreibung einer wissenschaftlichen Textsorte: DasPeer Review, in:K. D. Baumann, H. Kalverkämper (Eds),Kontrastive Fachsprachenforschung, Narr, Tübingen, 1992, pp. 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauskopf, S. H. (Ed.),Chemical Sciences in the Modern World, Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, T. N., Reedijk, J., A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overal citations only,Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, A.,A Bibliography and Index, Vol. 1: 1874–1959, Allm, Watford, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarros, N., Ruthenberg, K., Schummer, J. (Eds),Philosophie der Chemie-Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick, Köningshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J., Scientometric studies on chemistry I: The exponential growth of chemical substances, 1800–1995,Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellen, M. K.,Bibliometrics: An Annotated Bibliography, 1970–1990, Hall, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schummer, J. Scientometric studies on chemistry II: Aims and methods of producing new chemical substances. Scientometrics 39, 125–140 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457434

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457434

Keywords

Navigation