Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that a behavior and performance testing paradigm, in which rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) manipulate a joystick to respond to computer-generated stimuli, provides environmental enrichment and supports the psychological well-being of captive research animals. The present study was designed to determine whether computer-task activity would be affected by pair-housing animals that had previously been tested only in their single-animal home cages. No differences were observed in productivity or performance levels as a function of housing condition, even when the animals were required to “self-identify” prior to performing each trial. The data indicate that cognitive challenge and control are as preferred by the animals as social opportunities, and that, together with comfort/health considerations, each must be addressed for the assurance of psychological well-being.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, M. W., 1994. An automated identification system for use with computer-controlled tasks.Behav. Res. Meth., Instruments, & Computers, 26: 32–34.
Cross, H. A. &H. F. Harlow, 1965. Prolonged and progressive effects of partial isolation on the behavior of macaque monkeys.J. Exp. Res. Personality, 1: 39–49.
Davenport, R. K., C. M. Rogers, &D. M. Rumbaugh, 1973. Long-term cognitive deficits in chimpanzees associated with early impoverished environments.Develop. Psychol., 9: 343–347.
Fox, M. W., 1986. Handling, socialization, and caretaker effects. In:Laboratory Animal Husbandry: Ethology, Welfare, and Experimental Variables,M. Fox (ed.), SUNY Press, Albany, New York, pp. 71–83.
Hopf, S. &M. Herzog, 1985. Onset of peer interactions in socially inexperienced squirrel monkeys.Folia Primatol., 44: 121–128.
Malone, T. W. &M. R. Lepper, 1987. Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In:Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction; III. Cognitive and Affective Process Analysis,R. E. Snow &M. J. Farr (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 223–253.
Novak, M. A., 1979. Social recovery of monkeys isolated for the first year of life: II. Long-term assessment.Develop. Psychol., 15: 50–61.
—, &S. L. Suomi, 1988. Psychological well-being of primates in captivity.Amer. Psychologist, 43: 765–773.
Reinhardt, V., D. Cowley, S. Eisele, R. Vertein, &W. D. Houser, 1987. Pairing compatible female rhesus monkeys for cage enrichment has no negative impact on body weight.Lab. Prim. Newsletter, 27: 13–15.
Rumbaugh, D. M., W. K. Richardson, D. A. Washburn, E. S. Savage-Rumbaugh, &W. D. Hopkins, 1989. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), video tasks, and implications for stimulus-response spatial contiguity.J. Comp. Psychol., 103: 32–38.
Suomi, S. J., 1982. Abnormal behavior and primate models of psychopathology. In:Primate Behavior,J. L. Fobes &J. E. King (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 171–215.
Washburn, D. A. &D. M. Rumbaugh, 1991. Impaired performance from brief social isolation of rhesus monkeys: a multiple video-task assessment.J. Comp. Psychol., 105: 145–151.
— & —, 1992a. Investigations of rhesus monkey video-task performance: evidence for enrichment.Contemp. Topics Lab. Anim. Sci., 31: 6–10.
— & —, 1992b. Testing priates with joystick-based automated apparatus: lessons from the Language Research Center's computerized test system.Behav. Res. Meth., Instruments, & Computers, 24: 157–164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Washburn, D.A., Harper, S. & Rumbaugh, D.M. Computer-task testing of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in the social milieu. Primates 35, 343–351 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382730
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382730