Skip to main content
Log in

Tool use in capuchin monkeys: Distinguishing between performing and understanding

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A horizontal plexiglas tube containing a food-reward was presented to four naive tufted capuchins and suitable sticks were provided to push the reward out. Three monkeys out of four spontaneously used the tools and showed very different styles of solving the task. In more complex conditions, in which the sticks needed to be combined or actively modified in order to become effective, the monkeys were always successful; however, their performance was loaded with errors which did not disappear throughout the trials. Evidence of a difference between success in solving the problem and its understanding was found. This suggests that although capuchins can discover new means through active experimentation, they do not mentally represent the characteristics necessary for a tool to be effective, nor do they modify the tool appropriately beforehand. At this level, a major difference with chimpanzees emerges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, J., 1974. Observation study of behavior: Sampling methods.Behaviour, 49: 337–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antinucci, F. &E. Visalberghi, 1986. Tool use inCebus apella: A case study.Int. J. Primatol., 7: 349–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., 1979.The Emergence of Symbols. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, B. B., 1980.Animal Tool Behavior. Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, C. & E. Boesch, 1988. Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Colloque International de la Fondation Fyssen,L'usage de l'outil chez les primates humains et non-humains, Versailles, November 25–29.

  • ———— &H. Boesch, 1983. Optimisation of nut-cracking with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees.Behaviour, 83: 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S., 1988. Use of a club by a wild white-faced capuchin (Cebus capucinus) to attack a venomous snake (Bothrops asper).Amer. J. Primatol., 14(2): 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. R. &H. F. Harlow, 1961. Note on a cebus monkey's use of a stick as a weapon.Psychol. Rep., 8: 418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, M. B., 1987. Tool use and manufacture in manipulanda-deprived capuchins (Cebus apella).Amer. J. Primatol., 12(3): 337. (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan, L. M., in press. Vertebrate predation inCebus capucinus: meat eating in a neotropical monkey.Folia Primatol.

  • Fragaszy, D. M. &E. Visalberghi, 1989. Social influences on the acquisition and use of tools in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).J. Comp. Psychol., 103: 159–170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, S. E. &S. W. Sroges, 1966. Curiosity in zoo animals.Behaviour, 26: 151–188.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J., 1986.The Chimpanzees of Gombe. The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.

  • Hoffstetter, R., 1974. Phylogeny and geographic deployment of the Primates.J. Human Evol., 3: 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1980. Origin and deployment of New World monkeys emphasizing the southern continents route. In:Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &B. Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York & London, pp. 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluver, H., 1933.Behavior Mechanisms in Monkeys. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1937. Re-examination of implement-using behaviour in a cebus monkey after an interval of three years.Acta Psychol., 2: 347–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, W., 1925.The Mentality of Apes. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, W. C., 1974. Tool use by wild chimpanzees in feeding upon driver ants.J. Human Evol., 3: 501–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----, in press. Why is ape tool-use so confusing? In:Comparative Socioecology: the Behavioral Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals,V. Standen & R. Foley (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Parker, S. &K. R. Gibson, 1977. Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes.J. Human Evol., 6: 623–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poti', P. & S. T. Parker, in press. The role of innate fixed action patterns in ontogenetic and experiential development of intelligent use of sticks inCebus monkeys. In:Language and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Comparative Developmental Perspectives,S. T. Parker & K. Gibson (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

  • Terborgh, J. W., 1983.Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visalberghi, E., 1987. The acquisition of nut-cracking behavior in two capuchin monkeys groups (Cebus apella).Folia Primatol., 49: 168–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1988. Responsiveness to objects in two social groups of tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Amer. J. Primatol., 15: 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &W. A. Mason, 1983. Determinants of problem-solving success inSaimiri andCallicebus.Primates, 24: 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westergaard, G. C. &D. M. Fragaszy, 1985. Effects of manipulatable objects on the activity of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Zoo Biol., 4: 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———— & ————, 1987. The manufacture and use of tools by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).J. Comp. Psychol., 2: 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M., 1943.Chimpanzees. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &A. W. Yerkes, 1929.The Great Apes. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Visalberghi, E., Trinca, L. Tool use in capuchin monkeys: Distinguishing between performing and understanding. Primates 30, 511–521 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380877

Key Words

Navigation