Skip to main content
Log in

Visualization of the abrasive-waterjet cutting process

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cutting with abrasive waterjets was visualized in three types of materials: Lexan, Lucite and glass. Movie cameras were used at speeds of 64 and 1000 frames/s to record sequences of the jet penetration in these materials. It was found that the cutting process consists of two basic modes of erosion. The first, known as the cutting-wear mode, occurs at relatively shallow angles of impact. This mode results in a steady-state jet-solid interface. The other mode, the deformation-wear mode, occurs at large angles of impact and results in an unsteady penetration zone. The relative contribution of each of these two modes or mechanisms to material removal depends on the process parameters. The cutting process is cyclic in nature when the deformation-wear mechanism is partially or totally contributing to cutting. Qualitative and quantitative results of these visualization experiments suggest a mechanistic model for the penetration process. The results of this work may also be expanded to explain other ‘stream-like’ cutting-tool processes, such as laser and flame cutting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

d j :

jet diameter

d m :

mixing-tube diameter

d n :

waterjet-orifice diameter

f :

camera speed in frames per second

h :

depth of cut

\(\dot h\) :

penetration rate

h c :

depth of cut due to cutting wear

h d :

depth of cut due to deformation wear

h f :

depth of uncut portion due to jet deflection at the exit

\(\dot m\) :

particle-mass-flow rate

N :

number of passes

n f :

number of frames over which depthh is achieved

P :

waterjet pressure

P c :

critical threshold pressure

t :

time

u :

traverse rate

X o :

entry length after which jet reaches maximum depth

θ c :

angle between jet-velocity vector and traversevelocity vector

θ e :

jet-deflection angle at entry edge

θ f :

interface angle at depthh f

θ o :

initial angle of jet-solid interface

References

  1. Hashish, M., “Cutting with Abrasive-Waterjets,”Mech. Eng.,106 (3),60 (March 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hashish, M., “Modelling Study of Abrasive Jet Metal Cutting,” Phase I Report to National Science Foundation under Grant MEA-81-14500, Flow Res. Rep. No. 229 (March 1982).

  3. Hashish, M., “A Modelling Study of Metal Cutting with Abrasive-Waterjets,”J. Eng. Mat. Tech., ASME Trans.,106 (1),88–100 (Jan. 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hashish, M., “On the Modelling of Abrasive-Waterjet Cutting,” Proc. 7th Int. Jet Cutting Symp., BHRA, 249–265 (1984).

  5. Bitter, J.G.A., “A Study of Erosion Phenomena—Part II,”Wear,6,169–190 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Treatise on Materials Science and Technology,”ed. C. Preece,Erosion, 16,Academic Press,New York,69-126 (1979).

  7. Finnie, I., “The Mechanism of Erosion of Ductile Metals,” Proc. 3rd Nat. Cong. of Appl. Mech., ASME, 527–532 (1958).

  8. Finnie, I., “Erosion of Surface by Solid Particles,”Wear,3,87–103 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashish, M., “Abrasive-Waterjet Cutting Studies,” Proc. 11th Conf. on Production Research and Technology, NSF (May 1984).

  10. Hashish, M., “Aspects of Abrasive-Waterjet (AWJ) Performance Optimization,” Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA (Sept. 1986).

  11. Smeltzer, G.E., Gulden, M.E. andCompton, W.A., “Mechanisms of Metal Removal by Impacting Dust Particles,”J. Basic Eng., ASME Trans.,92,639–654 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashish, M. Visualization of the abrasive-waterjet cutting process. Experimental Mechanics 28, 159–169 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02317567

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02317567

Keywords

Navigation