Abstract
The problem considered is the use of a set of measurements on an individual to decide from which of several populations he has been drawn. It is assumed that in each population there is a probability distribution of the measurements. Principles for choosing the rule of classification are based on costs of misclassification. Optimum procedures are derived in general terms. If the measurements are normally distributed, the procedures use one discriminant function in the case of two populations and several discriminant functions in the cases of more populations. The numerical example given involves three normal populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, T. W. The non-central Wishart distribution and certain problems of multivariate statistics.Ann. math. Stat., 1946,17, 409–431.
Brown, George W. Basic principles for construction and application of discriminators.J. clin. Psychol., 1950,6, 58–61.
Fisher, R. A. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems.Ann. Eugen., 1936,7, 179–188.
Fisher, R. A. The statistical utilization of multiple measurements.Ann. Eugen., 1938,8, 376–386.
Pearson, K. Tables for Statisticians and Biometricians, Part II. Cambridge University Press, 1931.
Rao, C. R. The utilization of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification.J. roy. stat. Soc., Series B, 1948,10, 159–193.
von Mises, R. On the classification of observation data into distinct groups.Ann. math. Stat., 1945,16, 68–73.
Wald, A. On a statistical problem arising in the classification of an individual into one of two groups.Ann. math. Stat., 1944,15, 145–163.
Wald, A. Foundations of a general theory of sequential decision functions.Econometrica, 1947,15, 279–313.
Welch, B. L. Note on discriminant functions.Biometrika, 1939,13, 218–220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Sponsored in part by the Office of Naval Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, T.W. Classification by multivariate analysis. Psychometrika 16, 31–50 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313425
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313425