Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interactive technology and authoring tools: A historical review and analysis

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computer systems, interactive technologies, and the software tools for authoring multimedia programs have evolved over the past several decades. The evolution of multimedia technology is discussed and current alternatives for authoring multimedia programs are described. Issues related to analyzing authoring tool requirements and selecting software are presented and trends in the evolution of authoring tools are identified. Many factors affecting the selection and use of authoring software are exogenous to the technology itself. Both technological trends and market forces must be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avner, A., Smith, S., & Tenczar, P. (1984). CBI authoring tools: Effects on productivity and quality.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 11(3), 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, O. (1989). Information technology and undergraduate medical education.Academic Medicine, 64(4), 187–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, S., Moran, T., & Newell, A. (1980). The keystroke-level model of user performance time with interactive systems.Communications of the ACM, 23(7), 396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, J., Diehl, V., & Norman, K. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface.Proceedings of CHI '88: Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996).The systematic design of instruction, (4th ed.). Harper Collins: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. (1992).Courseware portability. IDA PaperP-2648. Alexandria, Virginia: Institute for Defense Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M. (1997). Using a Web-based course authoring tool to develop sophisticated Web-based courses. In B. Khan (Ed.),Web-based instruction (pp. 307–312). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, B., & Droms, K. (1994). The instructional design process and the use of authoring systems for computer-based training. In W. Milheim (Ed.),Authoring-systems software for computer-based training. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilder, G. (1994).Life after television: The coming transformation of media and American life. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication.Contemporary Education 68(2), 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L., & Frick, T. (1997). Evaluation guidelines for Web-based course authoring systems. In B. Khan (Ed.),Web-based instruction (pp. 299–306). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillelsohn, M. (1984). Benchmarking authoring systems.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 11(3), 95–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, R. (1969). A diagnosis of failure.AV Communication Review, 17(3), 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. (1974).The politics of educational innovation. Berkeley, California: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegal, J., & Heines, J. (1993). Improving visual programming languages for multimedia authoring.Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Annual, 286–293.

  • Lo, R., Locatis, C., Ullmer, E., Carr, V., Banvard, B., Le, Q., Williamson, M., & Ackerman, M. (1992). Developing a database of authoring system software.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(2), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., & Carr, V. (1985a).Systems for authoring computer-based instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., & Carr, V. (1985b). Selecting authoring systems.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12(2), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., & Carr, V. (1986). Authoring systems and some assumptions about them.Journal of Biomedical Communications, 13(2), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis C., Carr, V., & Allred, K. (1988). Using a lesson-element keystroke-oriented approach for estimating authoring tool efficiency.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(1), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., & Park, O. (1992). Some uneasy inquiries into ID expert systems.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., Ullmer, E., Carr, V., Banvard, B., Le, Q., Lo, R., & Williamson, M. (1992a). Authoring systems reassessed.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(2), 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., Ullmer, E., Carr, V., Banvard, B., Le, Q., Lo, R., & Williamson, M. (1992b).Authoring systems. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., & Weisberg, M. (1997). Distributed learning and the Internet.Contemporary Education, 68(2), 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, P., & Horton, S. (1998). Hypertext Markup Language as an authoring tool for CD-ROM production.Journal of Biocommunication, 25(2), 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKnight, C., & Balagopalan, S. (1989). An evaluation tool for measuring authoring system performance.Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1231–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. (1990a). Limitations of first generation instructional design.Educational Technology, 30(1), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. (1990b). The second generation instructional design research program.Educational Technology, 30(3), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milheim, W. (Ed.). (1994).Authoring-systems software for computer-based training. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1993).Things that make us smart. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piemme, T. (1988). Computer-assisted learning and evaluation in medicine.Journal of the American Medical Association, 260(3), 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P., & Russell, D. (1990). The instructional design environment Technology to support design problem solving.Instructional Science, 19(2), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P.J., Calhoun, C., and Smith Lea, N. (1992). Educational applications of a networked database.Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1967).Technology and change. New York: Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seachrist, D. (1996). How mulitmedia multitools compare.Byte, 21(11), 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. (1990).Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S., & Locatis, C. (1996). PLUS and portability evaluation.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1993). Overview: Fuel for a new discipline. In B. Shneiderman (Ed.),Sparks of innovation in human-computer interaction, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B., & Kearsley, G. (1989).Hypertext hands-on! An introduction to a new way of organizing and accessing information. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siglar, J. (1997).Multimedia authoring systems. FAQ Version 2.13, URL: http://www.tiac.net/users /ja siglar/MMASFAQ.HTML.

  • Tripp, S., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy.Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, B. (1994). Author! Author!.Training and Development, 48(5), 97–102, 104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD

    Craig Locatis

  2. George Washington University, Washington DC

    Hana Al-Nuaim

Authors
  1. Craig Locatis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hana Al-Nuaim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Locatis, C., Al-Nuaim, H. Interactive technology and authoring tools: A historical review and analysis. ETR&D 47, 63–75 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299634

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299634

Keywords

Search

Navigation