Skip to main content
Log in

Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most widely-used computer programs for structural equation models analysis are the LISREL series of Jöreskog and Sörbom. The only types of constraints which may be made directly are fixing parameters at a constant value and constraining parameters to be equal. Rindskopf (1983) showed how these simple properties could be used to represent models with more complicated constraints, namely inequality constraints on unique variances. In this paper, two new concepts are introduced which enable a much wider variety of constraints to be made. The concepts, “phantom” and “imaginary” latent variables, allow fairly general equality and inequality constraints on factor loadings and structural model coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference notes

  • Rindskopf, D. (1982).Parameterizing equality constraints in factor analysis and structural modeling. Unpublished manuscript.

References

  • Bentler, P. M. (1976). Multistructure statistical model applied to factor analysis.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 11, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Lee, S. Y. (1983). Structural models with polynomial constraints.Applied Psychological Measurement, in press.

  • Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables.Psychometrika, 45, 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1977). Structural equation models in the social sciences: Specification, estimation and testing. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Applications of statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1978).LISREL IV: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1981).LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. (Research Report 81–8) Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala, Department of Statistics, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y. (1980). Estimation of covariance structure models with parameters subject to functional restraints.Psychometrika, 45, 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y., & Tsui, K.-L. (1982). Covariance structure analysis in several populations.Psychometrika, 47, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1978). A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1980). A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures: Some remarks on applications.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindskopf, D. (1983). Parameterizing inequality constraints on unique variances in linear structural models.Psychometrika, 48, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wismer, D. A., & Chattergy, R. (1978).Introduction to nonlinear optimization. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

During the preparation of this article, it was discovered that another researcher, Jack McArdle, had concurrently and independently discovered some of the techniques reported here. While he has chosen not to publish his research, I wish to acknowledge his work. I would like to thank Art Woodward for telling me about “sort-of simple” structure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rindskopf, D. Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika 49, 37–47 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294204

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294204

Keywords

Navigation