Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical consideration of mastery scores

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The kind of mastery score problem often encountered in educational and psychological testing may be roughly described as follows: given that a certain unit of instruction must be mastered by a subject, a test is administered at the end of this unit and, on the basis of the observed score or an estimate of the true score, a decision is made about the grant of the mastery status. If the subject is declared master of the unit, he will be allowed to proceed to the next unit of instruction. Otherwise, remedial work will be given. Given relevant consequences of misclassification, the problem is to determine an optimum decision rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, R. C. Computer-based instruction in initial reading. InIn Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkson, J. A statistical precise and relatively simple method of estimating the bio-assay with quantal response, based on the logistic function.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1953,48, 565–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick,Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. Experiments for nonlinear functions.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1973,68, 771–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, R. L. Criterion-referenced measurements: limitations.School Review, 1971,69, 282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrick, J. A. An evaluation model for mastery testing.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971,8, 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. L.Computer assistance for individualizing measurement. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. S.Mathematical statistics: a decision theoretic approach. New York: Academic Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. Functional education for the seventies.Phi Delta Kappan, 1967,49, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. Adapting the elementary school curriculum to individual performance.In Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. and Nitko, A. J. Measurement in learning and instruction. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.)Educational measurement. Washington: American Council on Education, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K. Testing and decision-making procedures for selected individualized instructional programs.Review of Educational Research, 1974,44, 371–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K. and Novick, M. R. Toward an integration of theory and method for criterion-referenced tests.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973,10, 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Application Program, System/360.Scientific subroutines package (360-CM-03X) Version III, programmer's manual. White Plains, New York: IBM Corporation Technical Publications Department, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, J. A. and Lord, F. M. A theoretical distribution for mental test scores.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. Tailored testing, an application of stochastic approximation.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1971,66, 707–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R. and Jackson, P. H.Statistical methods for educational and psychological research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K.Tables of the incomplete beta function. Cambridge: University Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, W.Real and complex analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaifer, R.Analysis of decisions under uncertainty. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part of this work was completed while the author was Visiting Researcher at the Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, in the summer of 1973. Gratitude is extended to Robert Glaser for the invitation and to Anthony Nitko for helpful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huynh, H. Statistical consideration of mastery scores. Psychometrika 41, 65–78 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291698

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291698

Keywords

Navigation