The coevolution of population and environment: The ecology and ideology of feedback relations in Pakistan
- Dr. Michael R. Dove
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A new approach to the study of population and environment is proposed, based on Norgaard's theory of “co-evolution.” This theory is applied to two developments currently underway in Pakistan: the transfer of tree cover from public forests to private farms, and the partial replacement of woodfuel by dungfuel in household hearths. Both developments are characterized by feedback from the ecosystem to the sociosystem, which consists of a shift of regulatory mechanisms and complexity from the former to the latter. The efficacy of this feedback depends on an accurate perception of the process by the participating population. These perceptions are more accurate in the case of the forest-farm transition than the woodfuel-dungfuel transition, and this explains why the latter appears less sustainable than the former. Accuracy of perception also varies systematically between government officials and local peoples, primarily due to openness to explanations of behavior based on population/resource pressure. It is concluded that external development agencies have a potentially important role to play in demystifying perception of feedback processes between ecosystem and sociosystem.
- Abernethy, V. (1988). Editorial: The road taken.Population and Environment 10(1), 3–4. CrossRef
- Agarwal, B. (1986).Cold hearths and barren slopes: The woodfuel crisis in the third world. Riverdale (MD.): Riverdale Co. for Institute of Economic Growth.
- Barnard, G. & Kristoferson, L. (1985).Agricultural residues as fuel in the third world. IIED Energy Information Programme, Technical Report No.4. London: Earthscan.
- Bernier, F. (1891).Travels in the Mogul Empire: AD 1656–1668. Archibald Constable (Tr.). Delhi: S. Chand.
- Blaikie, P. (1985).The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. London: Longman.
- Bokhari, A.S. (1989). Pakistan: A review and analysis of forest policy and legislation. Consultant's Report. Islamabad: World Bank.
- Buhler, G. (Tr.) (1964).The laws of Manu. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (Orig. 1886. Oxford University Press.)
- Campbell, T. (1992). Socio-economic aspects of household fuel use in Pakistan. In M.R. Dove & C. Carpenter (Eds.).The sociology of natural resources in Pakistan and adjoining countries: Case studies in applied social science (pp. 304–329). Lahore: Vanguard Press for the Mashal Foundation.
- Carpenter, C. (1990). Women and livestock, fodder, and uncultivated land in Pakistan: A summary of role responsibilities.Society and Natural Resources 4, 65–79.
- Cernea, M.M. (1985). Alternative units of social organization sustaining afforestation strategies. In M.M. Cernea (Ed.).Putting people first: sociological variables in rural development (pp. 267–293). New York: Oxford University Press for The World Bank.
- Champion, H.G., Seth, S.K., Khattak, G.M. (1965).Forest types of Pakistan. Peshawar: Pakistan Forest Institute.
- Dewees, P.A. (1989). The woodfuel crisis reconsidered: Observations on the dynamics of abundance and scarcity.World Development 17(8), 1159–1172. CrossRef
- Dove, M.R. (1990). The anthropology of development vs. development anthropology: Mediating the forester-farmer relationship in Pakistan.Practicing Anthropology 13(2), 21–28.
- Dove, M.R. (1992a). Foresters' beliefs about farmers: An agenda for social science research in social forestry.Agroforestry Systems 17, 13–41. CrossRef
- Dove, M.R. (1992b). The dialectical history of “jungle” in the subcontinent.Journal of Anthropological Research 48(3), 231–253.
- Eckholm, E.P. (1976).Losing ground: Environmental stress and world food prospects. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. for the Worldwatch Institute.
- Government of Pakistan (G.O.P.) (1962). TheWest Pakistan forest manual, Vol.I. Peshawar: G.S.&P. Dept.
- Kangle, R.P. (1988). TheKautilya Arthasastra. 3 Vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (Orig. 1969. Bombay: Bombay University Press.)
- Leach, G. (1987).Household energy in South Asia. London: Elsevier Applied Science.
- Macdonell, A.A. & Keith, A.B. (1958).Vedic index of names and subjects, 2 vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (Orig. 1912. London.)
- Michie, B.H. (1986). Indigenous technology and farming systems research: Agroforestry in the Indian desert. In J.R. Jones & B.J. Wallace (Eds.).Social sciences and farming systems research (pp. 221–244). Boulder: Westview Press.
- Norgaard, R.B. (1981). Sociosystem and ecosystem coevolution in the Amazon.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8, 238–254. CrossRef
- Norgaard R.B. (1984a). Coevolutionary agricultural development.Economic Development and Culture Change 32(3), 525–546. CrossRef
- Norgaard R.B. (1984b). Coevolutionary development potential.Land Economics 60(2), 160–173.
- Norgaard R.B. (1987). Economics as mechanics and the demise of biological diversity.Ecological Modelling 38, 107–121. CrossRef
- Norgaard R.B. (1988). Sustainable development: a co-evolutionary view.Futures (December), 606–620. CrossRef
- Norgaard R.B. (1989). The case for methodological pluralism.Ecological Economics 1, 37–57. CrossRef
- Rao, S. (1957). History of our knowledge of the Indian fauna through the ages.Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 54(2), 251–280.
- Rappaport, Roy A. (1978). Maladaptation in social systems. In J. Friedman & M.J. Rowlands (Eds.).Evolution of Social Systems, (pp. 49–71). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Rauf, M.A. (1981).Forestry development in Pakistan: A study of human perspectives. Peshawar: Pakistan Forest Institute.
- Repetto, R. (1988).The forest for the trees? Government policies and the misuse of forest resources. Washington, D.C: World Resources Institute.
- Sardar, M.R. (1986). Mountain farmers' perceptions of soil erosion and response to soil conservation. Ph.D. dissertation, S.U.N.Y. Syracuse.
- Sheikh, M.I. (1986).A case study on hurries—Acacia nilotica block plantations for wood production in Pakistan. Peshawar: Pakistan Forest Institute.
- Shiva, V. (1989).Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books.
- Sopher, D.E. (1980). Indian civilization and the tropical savanna environment. In D.R. Harris (Ed.).Human ecology in savanna environments, (pp. 185–207). London: Academic Press.
- Thompson, M., Warburton, M., & Hatley, T. (1986).Uncertainty on a Himalayan scale: An institutional theory of environmental perception and a strategic framework for the sustainable development of the Himalaya. London: Ethnographica.
- Whyte, R.O. (1968).Grasslands of the monsoon. London: Faber and Faber.
- Wolf, E.R. (1982).Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- The coevolution of population and environment: The ecology and ideology of feedback relations in Pakistan
Population and Environment
Volume 15, Issue 2 , pp 89-111
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. East-West Center, Program on Environment, 1777 East-West Road, 96848, Honolulu, Hawaii