This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Adorno, T. W.Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1956.
Adorno, T. W.Negative Dialektik. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp, 1966.
Apel, K.-O.Transformation der Philosophie, Vol. I. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973.
Böhler, D.Metakritik der Marxschen Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971.
Gadamer, H.-G.“Replik,” Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971.
Habermas J.Theorie und Praxis (orig. publ. 1963). Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1969. (a)
Habermas, J. Gegen einen positivistisch halbierten Rationalismus (orig. publ. 1964). In T. W. Adorno (Ed.),Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1969. (b)
Habermas, J. Summation and response.Continuum 1970,8 123–133, esp. p. 129. (a)
Habermas J. Towards a theory of communicative competence.Inquiry 1970,13 360–375, esp. p. 367. (b)
Habermas, J.Knowledge and human interests (orig. publ. 1968) (J. J. Shapiro, trans.). Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1971. (a)
Habermas, J.Towards a rational society. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1971. (b)
Habermas, J.Theorie und Praxis (orig. publ. 1963), 4th ed. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1971. (c)
Habermas, J.Erkenntnis und Interesse 2nd ed. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973. (a)
Habermas, J. Postscript toKnowledge and human interests (C. Lenhardt, trans.).Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1973,3 157–180. (b)
Habermas, J., & Luhmann, N.Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971.
Heidegger, M.What is called thinking? (F. D. Wieck & J. G. Gray, trans.). New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
Heidegger M. The origin of the work of art. InPoetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, trans.). New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Kisiel, T. Ideology critique and phenomenology: The current debate in German philosophy.Philosophy Today 1970,14 151–160.
Kisiel, T. On the dimensions of a phenomenology of science in Husserl and the young Dr. Heidegger.Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 1973,4 217–234.
Kisiel, T. In W. Dallmayr (Ed.),Materialen zu Habermas' “Erkenntnis und Interesse”. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1974.
Kockelmans, J. J., & Kisiel, T. J.Phenomenology and the natural sciences. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Marcuse, H.Reason and revolution. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1960.
Marcuse, H. One-dimensional man. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1964.
Marx, K.Critique of Hegel's “Philosophy of Right” (A. John & J. O'Malley, trans.). London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Merleau-Ponty, M.Sense and non-sense (H. L. & P. A. Dreyfus, trans.). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
Pöggeler, O. Die ethischpolitische Dimension der hermeneutischen Philosophie. In G.-G. Grau (Ed.)Probleme der Ethik. Freiburg/Munich: Alber, 1972.
Ricoeur, P. Ethics and culture; Habermas and Gadamer in dialogue.Philosophy Today 1973,17 153–165.
Toulmin, S.Human understanding. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972.
Wetter, G. A.Dialectical materialism (P. Heath, trans.). New York: Praeger, 1958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this essay is published in German translation in (Kisiel, 1974).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kisiel, T. Habermas' purge of pure theory: Critical theory without ontology?. Hum Stud 1, 167–183 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132610
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132610