Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpretive sociology and Paul ricoeur

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abel, T. The operation called verstehen. In M. Truzzi (Ed.),Verstehen: Subjective understanding in the social sciences. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H.Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.Method and measurement in sociology. New York: The Free Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.Cognitive sociology. New York: The Free Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. Decontextualized meanings.Sociological Review 1971,3 301–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G.Truth and method. G. Barden & J. Cummings, trans. New York: Seabury, 1975. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. The problem of historical consciousness. J. L. Close, trans.Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 1975,5(1), 8–52. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.New rules of sociological method. New York: Basic Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. J.Historical knowing. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.Theory and practice. J. Viertel, trans. Boston: Beacon, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heap, J. L.Verstehen, language and warrants.The Sociological Quarterly 1977,18 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.Being and time. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M.B.Models and analysis in science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland, T. M. Gadamer and Ricoeur: The paradigm of the text.Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 1977,6 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C.Structural anthropology. C. Jacobson & B. G. Schoepf, trans. New York: Basic Books, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhwaite, W.Understanding social life. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R.Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellauer, D. The significance of the text in Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutical theory. In C. E. Reagan (Ed.),Studies in the philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. Athens: University of Ohio Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P.History and truth. C. A. Kelbley, trans. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. New developments in phenomenology in France: The phenomenology of language. P. G. Goodman, trans.Social Research 1967,34 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Structure-word-event. R. D. Sweeney, trans.Philosophy Today 1968,17(2), 114–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Husserl and Wittgenstein on language. In E. N. Lee & M. Mandelbaum (Eds.),Phenomenology and existentialism. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. The Model of the text.Social Research 1971, 38, 529–55. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. What is a text? Explanation and interpretation. In D. M. Rasmussen,Mythicsymbolic language and philosophical anthropology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. From existentialism to the philosophy of language. D. Pellauer, trans.Philosophy Today 1973, 17(2), 88–96. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. The task of hermeneutics. D. Pellauer, trans.Philosophy Today 1973,17(2), 112–128. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. The hermeneutical function of distanciation. D. Pellauer, trans.Philosophy Today 1973,17(2) 129–141. (c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Ethics and culture. D. Pellauer, trans.Philosophy Today, 1973, 17(2), 153–165. (d)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Human sciences and hermeneutical method. In D. Carr & E. S. Casey (Eds.).Explorations in phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973. (e)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Metaphor and the main problem of hermeneutics.New Literary History 1974,6(1), 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Phenomenology and hermeneutics. R. B. deFord, trans.Nous 1975,9 85–102. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Phenomenology of freedom. In E. Pivcevic (Ed.),Phenomenology and Philosophical Understanding. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press, 1975. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P.Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, Texas: The Texas Christian University Press, 1976. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. History and hermeneutics. D. Pellauer, trans.The Journal of Philosophy Nov. 4, 1976,73 (19), 683–695. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Phenomenology and the social sciences.The Annals of Phenomenological Sociology 1977,2 145–159. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Writing as a problem for literary hermeneutics.Philosophic Exchange 1977, 2, 3–15. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P.The philosophy of Paul Ricoeur C. E. Reagan & D. Stewart (Eds.). Boston, MA.: Beacon Press, 1978. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Explanation and understanding. C. E. Reagan and D. Stewart, trans. In Ricoeur, P.,The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur C. E. Reagan & D. Stewart (Eds.), Boston, MA: Beacon, 1978. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Can there be a scientific concept of ideology? In J. Bien (Ed.),Phenomenology and the social sciences: A dialogue. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1978. (c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, R. Some problems of interpretations historiography.The British Journal of Sociology 1976,27(3), 353–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.Speech acts. London: Cambridge, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. What is a speech act? In P. P. Giglioli (Ed.),Language and social context. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symposium. Hermeneutics and critical theory.Cultural Hermeneutics 1975,2(4) 307–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. Words, utterances and activities. In R. Turner (Ed.),Ethnomethodology. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weider, D. L.Language and social reality. The Hague: Mouton, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H. Preface. In D. L. Weider,Language and social reality. The Hague: Mouton, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Olivet College, Olivet, Michigan

    Steven McGuire

Authors
  1. Steven McGuire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGuire, S. Interpretive sociology and Paul ricoeur. Hum Stud 4, 179–200 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127456

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127456

Keywords

Search

Navigation