Skip to main content
Log in

Conclusions

This survey involved SBPC, its consumers, and their families in a shared task and work experience which had a direct useful purpose: the planning of the next phase in their collaboration. In this way, the survey, itself, was a vehicle for further cementing the collaborative relationship and was consistent with previous suggestions about promoting consumer and family participation (Church, 1989). Future agency efforts seeking to measure differences in priorities untapped by this survey will involve specific services and situations, such as preference in housing or medication (Uttaro & Mechanic, 1994). Having built the collaboration essential to this work, more complex surveys with refined research selection procedures will be implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernheim, K. (1987). Family consumerism: Coping with the winds of change. In A.B. Hatfield & H.P. Lefley (Eds.),Families of mentally ill: Coping and adaptation (pp. 244–260). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, K. (1989, June). User involvement in the mental health field in Canada.Canada's Mental Health, 22–25.

  • Hatfield, A.B. (1987). The National Alliance for the Mentally Ill: The meaning of a movement.International Journal of Mental Health, 15, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, H.J. (1991). Rehabilitation service needs of clinic patients: A program planning perspective.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 19, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J.A., & Srebnick, D. (1991). States' strategies for promoting supported housing for persons with psychiatric disabilities.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 42, 1116–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E.C. (Ed.). (1992). Mental health advocacy groups [Special issue].Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 20.

  • Sarkis, L., Dlugacz, D.P., & Wilner, M. (1987). A unique urban state hospital: Partial-hospital programs reduce full-time bed occupancy.The International Journal of Partial Hospitalization, 4, 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1990). Family advocacy and the mental health system: The recent rise of the Alliance for the Mentally Ill.Psychiatric Quarterly, 61, 205–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uttaro, T., & Mechanic, D. (1994). The NAMI consumer survey: Analysis of unmet needs.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 45, 372–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoorn, E. (1992). Changes? What changes? The views of the European patients' movement.The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 38, 30–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are grateful to FUTURE and Caring Community AMI for advice and consultation; Marianna Sarkis and Christianna Sarkis for assistance with data analysis; Joan E. Hanvey for editorial assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lieberman, H.J., Forbes, J., Uttaro, T. et al. Using needs surveys to foster consumer and family empowerment. Adm Policy Ment Health 23, 357–360 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02106813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02106813

Keywords

Navigation