Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of basic research in the social sciences: The case of education

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent expert evaluations of the condition and funding of educational research in the USA assume that basic research in the social sciences is a crucial factor in increasing our understanding and ultimately improving the practice of education (see, for example, the 1977 report1 of the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Fundamental Research Relevant to Education). Past tests of this assumption, however, have generally relied upon argument by example or anecdote. In the present study, we analyze citation patterns in the education literature to test the corollary proposition that basic research in the social sciences has had a substantial impact on the literature in education. Empirical data collected on citation patterns in the education literature are found to be largely consistent with this proposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. KIESLER, C. TURNER (Eds.).Fundamental Research and the Process of Education, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. CRONBACH P. SUPPES (Eds.)Research for Tomorrow's Schools: Disciplined Inquiry for Education, (Report of the Committee on Educational Research of the National Academy of Education) Macmillan, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Geraldine CLIFFORD, A history of the impact of teaching, in R. TRAVERS (Ed.),Second Handbook of Research on Teaching, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. MARGOLIS, Citation Indexing and the Evaluation of Scientific Papers,Science, 20 March, 155, (1967) 1213–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. GARFIELD, Citation Analysis as a Tool for Science Policy Studies.Science, 3 November 178, (1972) 471–479.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. GILBERT, S. WOOLGAR, The Quantitative Study of Science.Science Studies, 4, (1974) 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. BRITTAIN,Citation Patterns in the Social Sciences: results of pilot citation study. Unpublished manuscript; University Library, Bath University of Technology (England): October, 1972 (ERIC No. ED-078-867).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. BARRON, F. NARIN, Analysis of Research Journals and Related Research Structure in Education. Computer Horizons (Chicago, IL), unpublished (ERIC No. Ed-072-787).

  9. F. NARIN, S. D. GARSIDE, Journal Relationships in Special Education,Exceptional Children, 38, (1972) 695–702.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. GILES, G. WRIGHT: Political scientists evaluation of 63 journals.Political Science, 8, (1975) 254.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. HAWKINS, L. RITTER, I. WALTER, What economists think of their journals.Journal of Political Economics, 81, (1973) 1017–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. MACE H. WARNER. Ratings of psychology journals.American Psychologist, 28, (1973) 184–186.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. COMROE, R. DRIPPS. Scientific Bases for the Support of Biomedical Science.Science, 9 April, 192, (1976) 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, C.F., Kiesler, S.B. The impact of basic research in the social sciences: The case of education. Scientometrics 3, 177–190 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02101664

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02101664

Keywords

Navigation