Abstract
A rather recent interpretation of quantum mechanics, known under the various names of consistent histories, decohering histories, or logical interpretation, has brought interpretation into a standard deductive theory and is now investigated in many places. A key difference with the Copenhagen interpretation is the status of classical physics, now derived completely from quantum principles in both its dynamical and logical aspects. After describing briefly this new interpretation in its essentials, leaving aside technical details, it is shown how its consequences in epistemology differ drastically from the familiar outcomes of the Copenhagen interpretation, leading in particular to a well-defined theory of knowledge. Some more speculative philosophical consequences associated with the unsolved problem of actuality are also mentioned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb,Helv. Phys. Acta 46, 573 (1974).
W. H. Zurek,Phys. Rev. D 24, 1516 (1981);26, 1682 (1982).
A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett,Physica A 121, 587 (1983).
E. Joos and H. D. Zeh,Z. Phys. B 59, 223 (1985).
R. Griffiths,J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984).
R. Omnès,J. Stat. Phys. 53, 893 (1988).
R. Omnès,Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 201, 354 (1990).
M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, in Proceedings,3rd International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, S. Kobayashi, H. Ezawa, Y. Murayana, and S. Nomura, eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1991). Idem, inComplexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, W. H. Zurek, ed., Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, No. 8 (Addison-Wesley Redwood City, California 1991).
R. Omnès,Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 339 (1992).
R. Omnès,The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994).
E. U. Squires, talk at the Olympia conference (1993), unpublished.
N. Bohr,Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1958).
A. J. Leggett,Prog. Theor. Physics (Suppl.) 69, 1 (1980); J. Clarke, A. N. Cleland, M. H. Devoret, D. Estève, and J. M. Martinis,Science 239, 992 (1988).
W. Nagourney, J. Sandberg, and H. Dehmelt,Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 384 (1986); H. Dehmelt,Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 525 (1990).
J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932).
A. M. Gleason,J. Math. Mech. 6, 885 (1957).
P. Mittlestaedt,Quantum Logic (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978);Sprache und RealitÄt in der Modernen Physik (B. I. Hochschultaschenbücher, Mannheim, 1986).
G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann,Ann. Math. 37, 823 (1936).
K. Hepp,Commun Math. Phys. 35, 265 (1974); J. Ginibre and G. Velo,Commun Math. Phys. 66, 37 (1979); G. A. Hagedorn,Commun Math. Phys. 71, 77 (1980);77, 1 (1980);Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 135, 58 (1981).
E. P. Wigner,Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
H. Weyl,Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 56, 115 (1979).
L. Hörmander,Commun Pure Appl. Math. 32, 359 (1979).
L. Hörmander,Ark. Mat. (Sweden) 17, 297 (1979).
J. S. Bell,Helv. Phys. Acta 48, 93 (1975).
B. d'Espagnat,J. Stat. Phys. 56, 747 (1989).
R. Omnès,J. Stat. Phys. 62, 841 (1991).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
B. d'Espagnat,Found. Phys. 20, 1147 (1990).
J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964).
L. Wittgenstein,Philosophical Remarks, R. Rees, ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1967).
G. C. Ghirardi, A. Riminis and T. Weber,Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986).
H. Everett,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).
B. S. De Witt and N. Graham, Ed.,The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton 1973).
M. Heidegger,Vortrage und AufsÄtze (Pfullingen, Freiburg, 1954),Einführung in die Metaphysik (Max Niemeyer, Göttingen, 1952),Der Satz vom Grund (Pfullingen, Freiburg, 1957).
M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle,Phys. Rev. D 47, 3345 (1992).
Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman,Phys. Lett. A 178, 32 (1993).
B. d'Espagnat,Phys. Rep. 110, 201 (1984),Reality and the Physicist (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
P. Duhèm,La Théorie Physique (1914), P. Brouzeng, ed. (Vrin, Paris, 1989);σΩEINTA ΦAINOMENA (1908), P. Brouzeng, ed. (Vrin. Paris, 1990).
J. von Neumann (Ref. 15); F. London and E. Bauer,La théorie de l'observation en mécanique quamique (Hermann, Paris, 1939); E. P. Wigner,Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963).
S. Weinberg,Dreams of a Final Theory (Vintage, London, 1993).
R. Omnès,Philosophie de la science contemporaine (Gallimard, Paris, 1994).
A. Einstein, letter to Maurice Solovine dated May 7th 1952 inLettres à Maurice Solovine (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1956).
R. P. Feynman,The Character of Physical Law (Penguin, London, 1965).
R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands,Feynman Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Omnès, R. A new interpretation of quantum mechanics and its consequences in epistemology. Found Phys 25, 605–629 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059008
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059008