Abstract
Opportunities for obtaining a quantitative measure of respectability for ideas in the physical sciences appear to be rather infrequent. A unique set of statistics is presented which demonstrates the respectability gained when a centuries-old psychological rationalisation for a rare natural phenomenon is replaced by a viable physical explanation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Blagdon,Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, 74 (1784) 201.
J.A. Udden,Science, 46 (1917) 616.
C.C. Wylie,Popular Astronomy, 40 (1933) 289.
H.H. Nininger,Popular Astronomy 47 (1939) 97.
M.F. Romig, D.L. Lamar, RAND Memo. RM-3724-ARPA (1963)
M.F. Romig, “Meteore” No. 9, I.A.U. 17th General Assembly, Montreal (1979).
C.S.L. Keay,Science, 210 (1980) 11.
V.A. Bronshten,Physics of Meteoric Phenomena, D. Reidel Publ. Co., 1983.
W.R. Corliss,Handbook of Unusual Natural Phenomena, Sourcebook Project, Glen Arm, Md., 1982, p. 165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keay, C.S.L. Physics, psychology and respectability. Scientometrics 23, 355–359 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029803
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029803