Abstract
The assessment of the research performance of the Spanish Scientific Research Council using scientometric indicators was done. Number of scientists and budget involved in research projects were used as input measures while articles published in foreign journals, patent applications and citations received provided output figures. The time period studied was 1984–1987. Target of the analysis were wide research areas and the research Institutes included in them. The obtained results point out that very often costs, productivity and impact do not go in the same direction. Most likely, other activities no measurable by scientometric indicators may have played an important role in some Institutes. Besides, the presence of highly cited articles at Institutes with low productivity scores indicates not correspondence of quantity with impact. It is suggested that the research group level would be a more reliable unit for analysis than the aggregated level of Institute or research area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Science Indicators, Washington, National Science Board/National Science Foundation. From 1972 onwards, every second year.
P. Vinkler, Management system for a scientific research Institute based on the assessment of scientific publications,Research Policy, 15, 2(1986) 77–87.
A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun, Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all mayor science fields and sub-fields. 1981–1985.Scientometrics, 16(1989) 1–478.
H.F. Moed, A.F. van Raan,Indicators of Research Performance: Applications in University research Policy. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North Holland, 1988.
P.R. McAllister, D.A. Wagner, Relationship between R & D expenditure and publications output for U.S. Colleges and Universities,Research in Higher Education, 15,3 (1981).
F. Narin, R.P. Rozek, Bibliometric analysis of U.S. pharmaceutical industry research performance,Research Policy, 17(1988) 139–154.
A.G. Thomas, The use of output measures in the review of science. Seminar on evaluation in the management of R and D. European Economic Commission. United Nations. Madrid, 1989.
R. Fernández de Caleya, P. Pascual, Algunos datos sobre la evolución de la Física en España. Prospectiva en Física. Gabinete de Estudios de la Presidencia. CSIC. Madrid, 1988.
A.J. Lotka, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity,Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(1926) 317–323.
D. de S. Price, Some remarks on elitism in information and the invisible college phenomenon in science,Journal American Society for Information Science, 22(1971) 74–75.
H.J. Czerwon, Scientometric indicators for a specialty in theoretical high-energy Physics: Monte Carlo methods in lattice field theory,Scientometrics, 18(1990) 5–20.
H.A. Averch, Exploring the cost efficiency of basic research funding in chemistry,Research Policy, 18(1989) 165–172.
H.D. Daniel, R. Fish,Forschungsproduktivitaet in Messung und Foerderung von Froschungsleistung, Universitaetsverlag, Konstanz, GMBH, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Méndez, A., Salvador, P. The application of scientometric indicators to the Spanish Scientific Research Council. Scientometrics 24, 61–78 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026473
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026473