Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive consensus in recent mainstream American sociology: An empirical analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of observers have commented that American sociology has recently experimenced a shift in its cognitive structure. In order to empirically investigate these observations, citations in the two most prominent sociological journals during 1955 and 1970 are examined. The data indicate that (a) various theory groups account for a relatively small percentage of authors cited during either period, (b) a number of the earlier theory groups are less prominent than they once were, and (c) there is evidence of the emergence of one new theory group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. E. MOORE, The Whole State of Sociology,American Sociological Review, 24 (1959) No. 5, 716.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. M. LIPSET, N. SMELSER, Change and Controversy in Recent Americal Sociology,British Journal of Sociology, 12 (1961) No. 1, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. COLLINS, Sociology Building,Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 14 (1969) No. 1, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. KEELEY, Use of Reading Lists for Graduate Students in Sociology,Sociology and Social Research, 48 (1964) No. 3, 449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. POPOVICH, What American Sociologists Think About Their Science and Its Problems,The American Sociologist, 3 (1966) No. 2, 133.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. W. GOULDNER, J. T. SPREHE, Sociologists Look at Themselves,Trans-Action, 2 (1965) No. 3, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. OROMANER, The Most Cited Sociologists: An Analysis of Introductory Text Citations,The American Sociologist, 3 (1968) No. 2, 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. OROMANER, The Audience as a Determinant of the Most Important Sociologists,The American Sociologist, 4 (1969) No. 4, 332–335.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. OROMANER, The Structure of Influence in Contemporary Academic Sociology,The American Sociologist, 7 (1972) No. 2, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. C. MULLINS,Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology, Harper and Row, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. W. GOULDNER,The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, Basic Books, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. W. FRIEDRICHS,A Sociology of Sociology, The Free Press, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. H. WRONG, New Wine in Old Bottles — A Review of Two Books,The American Sociologist, 6 (1971) No. 3, 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. S. BROWN, B. G. GILMARTIN, Sociology Today: Lacunae, Emphases, and Surfeits,The American Sociologist, 4 (1969) No. 4, 283.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. LIN, C. E. NELSON, Bibliographic Reference Patterns in Core Sociological Journals, 1965–1966,The American Sociologist, 4 (1969) No. 1, 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. OROMANER, The Diffusion of Core Publications in American Sociology,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28 (1977) No. 1, 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. D. GLENN, American Sociologists' Evaluations of Sixty-three Journals,The American Sociologist, 6 (1971) No. 4, 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. CHUBIN, The Journal as a Primary Data Source in the Sociology of Science: With Some Observations From Sociology,Social Science Information, 14 (1975) No. 1, 164.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. R. COLE, H. ZUCKERMAN, The Emergence of a Scientific Specialty: The Self-Exemplifying Case of the Sociology of Science, in:The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton, L. A. COSER (Ed.), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1975, 146.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. C. MULLINS,op. cit.,.

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. C. MULLINS,op. cit.,, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. C. MULLINS,op. cit.,, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. COLE, J. R. COLE, L. DIETRICH, Measuring the Cognitive State of Scientific Disciplines, in:Toward A Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators, Y. ELKANA, J. LEDERBERG, R. K. MERTON, A. THACKRAY, H. ZUCKERMAN (Eds), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978, 209–251.

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. C. MULLINS,op. cit.,, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  26. N. C. MULLINS,op. cit.,, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. C. MULLINS,op. cit.,, p. 310–313.

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. C. MULLINS,op. cit.,, p. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. OROMANER,op. cit.,.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. COLE, J. R. COLE, L. DIETRICH,op. cit.,, p. 229–230.

    Google Scholar 

  31. N. C. MULLINS,op. cit.,, p. 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. R. COLE, H. ZUCKERMAN,op. cit.,.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. COLE, J. R. COLE, L. DIETRICH,op. cit.,.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. COLE, The Growth of Scientific Knowledge: Theories of Deviance as a Case Study, in:The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton, L. A. COSER (Ed.), harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1975, 175–220.

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. SHILS, Tradition, Ecology, and Institution in the History of Sociology,Daedalus, 99 (1970) No. 4, 817.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oromaner, M. Cognitive consensus in recent mainstream American sociology: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics 3, 73–84 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025631

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025631

Keywords

Navigation