Skip to main content
Log in

Quality assessment of science information research and service

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Problems of scientometrics depend on in which phase of research or development each scientometric activity is operating. So, discussions mut be very, specific. The golden age when scientoetrics was “little” is gone. Now the age has come when scientometrics must be “big” by being sponsored by policy makeers. However, scientometrics should consider the public around the policy makers and thus grow up to “bigger scientometrics”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Takahashi, The management of R&D for higheer productivity through applying the New QC7 Tools. In:H. Eto (Ed.),R&D Strategies in Japan, The National, Regional and Corporate Approach, Elsevier, Amsterrdam 1993, p. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.I. Gass, Decision-aiding models: Validation, assessment and related issues for policy analysis,Operations Research, 31 (1983) 603–631.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Comments on the paper byW. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin,Scientometrics, 30, (1994) 375.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eto, H. Quality assessment of science information research and service. Scientometrics 30, 429–432 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018118

Keywords

Navigation