Conclusion
I think that most of the problems mentioned in the GS paper are caused by natural evolutionary aspects of the discipline. It cannot be doubted that BIS is growing into a more and more professional research discipline. There are indeed problems of quality and of the fact that researchers have different origins. The first problem is evoluating in the right direction and the second one should be considered as an enrichment rather than as a negative fact. One must admit, nevertheless, that different subdisciplines will tend to live their own life, but that continuing contacts (such as joint conferences) remain important and are necessary for the further development of all these subdisciplines.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Egghe (1993). Bridging the gaps-Conceptual discussions on informetrics,Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics, Berlin, 11–15 September 1993 (to appear).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Comments on the paper byW. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin,Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 375.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egghe, L. Little science, big science... and beyond. Scientometrics 30, 389–392 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018109
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018109