Abstract
Patent information on 7392 inventors who received 9 or more U.S. Patents during 1975–84 was obtained. Analysis of the frequency distribution of patents per inventor reveals an approximately logarithmic decline from 9 to approximately 45 patents per inventor. The rate of decline decreases significantly for patent output above 45 patents per inventor. Patent citation analysis on 45 randomly selected inventors was performed. This sample included inventors who received from 9 to over 100 patents. The group received 1.79 citations per patent, 56.8% of the patents received at least 1 citation, and 2.7% of the patents received 10 or more citations. No statistically significant differences for these averages was found across the range of inventor patent output. No significant decline of patent quality with increased yearly patent output was observed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. J. LOTKA, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity,Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16 (1926) No. 12, 317.
D. DE SOLLA PRICE,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, New York, 1963, pp. 40–61.
C. ZENER, An analysis of scientific productivity,Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 59 (1968) No. 4, 1078.
P. D. ALLISON, J. A. STEWART, Productivity differences among scientists-evidence for accumulative advantage,American Sociological Review. 39 (1974) No. 4 596.
M. A. FAIA, Productivity among scientists—a replication and elaboration,American Sociological Review, 40 (1975) No. 6, 825.
R. C. COILE, Lotka's frequency distributions of scientific productivity,Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 28 (1977) No. 6, 266.
K. KRISCIUNAS, Lotka's law-year by year,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28 (1977) No. 1, 65.
W. SHOCKLEY, On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories,Proceedings of the IRE, 45 (1957) No. 3, 279.
J. F. O'BRYON, A profile of users of the U.S. patent system: 1968 and 1973, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975, pp. 47–48.
T. J. ALLEN, Roles in technical communication networks, inCommunication among Scientists and Engineers, C. E. NELSON, D. K. POLLOCK (Eds), D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Massachusetts, 1970, pp. 191–208.
M. P. CARPENTER, F. NARIN, P. WOOLF, Citation rates to technologically important patents,World Patent Information, 3 (1981) No. 4, 161.
R. S. CAMPBELL, L. O. LEVINE, Technology Indicators Based on Patent Data: Three Case Studies, prepared for the National Science Foundation under NSF Grant PRA 78-20321, Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington, 1984, pp. 2.9–2.10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levine, L.O. Prolific inventors—A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 10, 35–42 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016858
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016858