Abstract
Using the subjects desalination and educational psychology, the scatter of periodical articles over periodical titles was compared at two levels, the second level being a random sample of periodical articles cited by the first level. Several measures were used to compare the extent of scatter at the two levels. Some methods commonly used in bibliometrics produced conflicting evidence on whether the citing literature (first-level) or the cited (second-level) was more scattered. A computer-intensive sampling procedure, known as the Bootstrap method, was then used to estimate the scatter of the total cited population from the scatter of the empirical sample. Cumulative distributions were prepared to show what percentage of periodicals accounted for various percentages of articles at each level of scatter. Only at the 90th percentile of articles did the percentage of periodical titles in the cited literature significantly exceed that of the citing literature. At the tail-end of the Bradford-type distribution, the cited literature appears to be more scattered than the literature citing it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. C. BRADFORD, Sources of information on specific subjects,Engineering, 137 (26 January 1934) 85.
M. C. DROTT, B. C. GRIFFITH, An empirical examination of Bradford's law and the scattering of scientific literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science 29 (1978) 238.
For the number of articles contributed by each periodical see Tables 4 and 9 in: F. W. LANCASTER K. KONOPASEK, T. OWENS, The literature of educational psychology and the literature used by writers in educational psychology,Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10 (1985) 314.
For the number of articles contributed by each periodical, see Tables 4 and 15 in: C. G. PRABHA,A Comparison of Scatter of Citing and Cited Literature for the Subject of Desalination, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984, p. 61–64, 95–96.
B. C. BROOKES, The derivation and application of the Bradford-Zipf Distribution,Journal of Documentation, 24 (1968) 247.
S. LAWANI, Bradford's law and the literature of agriculture,International Library Review, 5 (1973) 347.
DROTT, op. cit., note 2 241.
P. DIACONIS, B. EFRON, Computer-intensive methods in statisticsScientific American, 248 (1983) 116.
DROTT, op. cit., note 2 241.
C. G. PRABHA, op. cit., note 4, For the number of articles contributed by each periodical, see Tables 4 and 15 in: C. G. PRABHA,A Comparison of Scatter of Citing and Cited Literature for the Subject of Desalination, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984, 240–241.
Ibid. C. G. PRABHA, op. cit., note 4 For the number of articles contributed by each periodical, see Tables 4 and 15 in: C. G. PRABHA,A Comparison of Scatter of Citing and Cited Literature for the Subject of Desalination, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984, p. 242–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prabha, C.G., Lancaster, F.W. Comparing the scatter of citing and cited literature. Scientometrics 12, 17–31 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016687
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016687