Skip to main content
Log in

The contribution of tacit knowledge to innovation

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tacit knowledge is widely acknowledged to be an important component of innovation, but such recognition is rarely accompanied by more detailed explanations about the nature of tacit knowledge, why such knowledge is significant, how it becomes codified or whether there may be limits to codification. This paper attempts to fill some of the gaps, drawing on a recent study of university/industry links in three emerging technologies. It concludes that tacit knowledge, which can only be transmitted through personal interaction, will continue to play an important role in innovation. This derives from a variety of reasons, but most significant are the complexity of systems and the emergence of new technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braun, E. and MacDonald, S. (1978),Revolution in Miniature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M. (1974) “The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks”,Science Studies,4, pp. 165–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988) “The nature of the innovative process”. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (Eds)Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, J. (1982) “Food Chemistry and Cuisine”, Chemistry and Industry, 17 July, pp. 481–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, W. (1986)Linkage between Industrial and Academic Research: The Case of Biotechnological Research in the Pharmaceutical Industry, DPhil Thesis, Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamm, K. (1988)Creating the Computer, The Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, J. (undated) “Configurations: Crystallising Contingency”, paper prepared for special issue of theInternational Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing on Systems, Networks and Configurations: Inside the Implementation Process.

  • Fleck, J. (1983) “The Effective Utilisation of Robots: The Management of Expertise and Know-how”,Proc. 6th British Robort Association Annual Conference, IFS Publications Ltd, Bedford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gann, D., Matthews, M., Patel, P. and Simmonds, P. (1992)Analysis of Private and Public Sector Funding of Research and Development in the Construction Sector, IPRA, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. and Johnston, R. (1974) “The Roles of Science in Technological Innovation”Research Policy,3, pp. 220–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, A. (1971)The Semiconductor Industry in Britain and the United States. A Case Study in Innovation, Growth and the Diffusion of Technology. DPhil Thesis, University of Sussex.

  • Hall, G.R. and Johnston, R.E. (1970) “Transfer of United States Aerospace Technology to Japan”. In R. Vernon (Ed)The Technology Factor in International Trade. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K. (1991)Globalization and Cross-border Networks of Japanese Firms, Paper presented to Japan in a Global Economy Conference, Stockholm School of Economics, 5–6 September.

  • Kenney, M. (1986)Biotechnology: the University-Industrial Complex. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S.J. (1990)Innovation Styles in Japan and the United States: Cultural Bases; Implications for Competitiveness, The 1989 Thurston Lecture, Report INN-3, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S.J. (1990)Models of Innovation and Their Policy Consequences. Paper presented at NISTEP International Conference on Science and Technology Policy Research — What Should be Done? What Can be Done? Tokyo.

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd Ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madeuf, B. (1984) “International technology transfers and international technology payments: Definitions, measurements and firms' behaviour”Research Policy,13, pp. 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. and Gibbons, M. (1989) “Technology, Variety and Organisation” In R. Rosenbloom and R. Burgelman (Eds)Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy,4, pp. 153–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D.F. (1979) “Social Choice in Machine Design: The Case of Automatically Controlled Machine Tools” In A. Zimbalist (Ed)Case Studies on the Labor Process. Monthly Review Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noaka, I. (1992) “Managing Innovation as an Organizational Knowledge Creation Process.” Paper prepared for(Tricontinental) Handbook of Technology Management, Institute of Business Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1987) “The objectives of technology policy.”Science and Public Policy,14(4), pp. 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984) “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory.Research Policy,13, pp. 343–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyani, M. (1969) “The Logic of Tacit Inference”.Knowing and Being, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyani, M. (1966)The Tacit Dimension, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J.R. (1971)Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982) “How exogenous is science?”Inside the black box. Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976)Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, A. (1989) “Collaboration as a Global Competitive Tactic”,R&D Management,19(4), pp. 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senker, J. and Faulkner, W. (1992) “Industrial use of public sector research in advanced technologies: a comparison of biotechnology and ceramics”.R&D Management,22(2), pp. 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senker, J. (1991)The Biotechnology Directorate's Programmes for Technology Transfer in Relation to Small and Medium Sized Firms. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senker, P., Buckingham, J. and Townsend, J. (1989) “Some Implications of Expert Systems for Work: In T. Bernold and U. Hillenkamp (Eds)Expert Systems in Production and Services II, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørenson, K.H. and Levold, N. (1992) “Tacit Networks, Heterogenous Engineers and Embodied Technology”Science, Technology, and Human Values,17(1), pp. 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitelman, R. (1989)Gene Dreams. Basic Books Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1991)Biotechnology in a Global Economy. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicenti, W. (1990)What Engineers Know and How They Know It, Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1988)The Sources of Innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. (1987) “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets”. In D. Teece (Ed)The Competitive Challenge. Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass. pp 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Senker, J. The contribution of tacit knowledge to innovation. AI & Soc 7, 208–224 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901817

Key words

Navigation