Skip to main content
Log in

On the definition and evolution of states in relativistic classical and quantum mechanics

  • Part IV. Invited Papers Dedicated To Sir Karl Popper
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some of the problems associated with the construction of a manifestly covariant relativistic quantum theory are discussed. A resolution of this problem is given in terms of the off mass shell classical and quantum mechanics of Stueckelberg, Horwitz and Piron. This theory contains many questions of interpretation, reaching deeply into the notions of time, localizability and causality. A proper generalization of the Maxwell theory of electromagnetic interaction, required for the well-posed formulation of dynamical problems of systems with electromagnetic interaction is discussed, and some of the significance of recently found (classical) relativistic chaotic behavior is pointed out. Many results of a technical nature have been achieved in this framework; in this paper, some of these are reviewed, but I shall concentrate on a discussion of the basic ideas and foundations of the theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. D. Newton and E. P. Wigner,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 400 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. C. Hegerfeldt,Phys. Rev. D 10, 3320 (1974);Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2395 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See discussions in P. A. M. Dirac,Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, London, 1958); C. Piron,Foundations of Quantum Physics (W. A. Benjamin, Reading, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. C. Hegerfeldt, M. K. Hinders, B. A. Rhodes, and C. V. H. Sandri, IASSNS-HEP-90/28, April 1990.

  5. J. R. Oppenheimer,Phys. Rev. 38, 725 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, J. S. Schwinger,Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951), and other fundamental papers reprinted inQuantum Electrodynamics, J. S. Schwinger, ed. (Dover, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Prugovecki,Quantum Geometry, to appear in theFundamental Theories of Physics series (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht), A. van der Merwe, ed.Found. Phys. 21, 93 (1991).

  8. E. C. G. Stueckelberg,Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 372, 588 (1941);15, 23 (1942). L. P. Horwitz and C. Piron,Helv. Phys. Acta 46, 316 (1973). See also J. R. Fanchi,Phys. Rev. D 20, 308 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. C. Schieve and L. P. Horwitz,Phys. Lett. A 156, 140 (1991), and to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. J. Taylor and J. A. Wheeler,Spacetime Physics (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Møller,The Theory of Relativity (The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952), for example.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For example, S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. P. Feynman,Phys. Rev. 80, 449 (1950), App. A. See also J. S. Schwinger, Ref. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Relativistic Action at a Distance: Classical and Quantum Aspects (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 162), J. Llosa, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1982);Proceedings, Workshop on Contraint's Theory and Relativistic Dynamics, Arcetri, Firenze, Italy, 1986, G. Longhi and L. Lusanna, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. P. Horwitz and F. Rohrlich,Phys. Rev. D 24, 1528 (1981), and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Newton,Principia (London, 1686). Andrew Motte's translation (1729) has been revised by F. Cajore,Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1962).

  17. L. P. Horwitz, R. I. Arshansky, and A. C. Elitzur,Found. Phys. 18, 1159 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. C. Land and L. P. Horwitz,Found. Phys. Lett. 21, 299 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. P. Feynman,Phys. Rev. 76, 769 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. A. Fock,Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 12, 404 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Piron, Ref. 3. See discussions in

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. P. Horwitz and F. Rotbart,Phys. Rev. D 24, 2127 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. P. Horwitz and Y. Rabin,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 17, 501 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Arshansky and L. P. Horwitz,J. Math. Phys. 30, 66 and 380 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. P. Horwitz and A. Soffer,Helv. Phys. Acta 53, 112 (1980). Completeness is proved in A. Soffer,Lett. Math. Phys. 8, 517 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. I. Arshansky and L. P. Horwitz,J. Math. Phys. 30, 213 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber,Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Arshansky and L. P. Horwitz,Phys. Rev. D 29, 2860 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. A. M. Dirac,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 392 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. Arshansky, L. P. Horwitz, and Y. Lavie,Found. Phys. 13, 1167 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Arshansky and L. P. Horwitz,J. Phys. A. Math. Gen. 15, L659 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. P. Wigner,Ann. Math. 40, 149 (1939), and, for example, M. Hamermesh,Group Theory and its Applications to Physical Problems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1962).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. R. P. Feynman,Phys. Rev. 76, 769 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1975), 2nd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. P. Horwitz, S. Shashoua, and W. C. Schieve,Physica A161, 300 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  37. L. P. Horwitz, W. C. Schieve, and C. Piron,Ann. Phys. 137, 306 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  38. B. Guinot,Journées relativistes (1988) 72, Dept. de Physique Théorique, Université de Genève (1989).

  39. C. Piron, in NATO Advanced Study Institute on Quantum Electrodynamics and Quantum Optics, Istanbul, Turkey, August 1989.

  40. W. Minkowski,The Principle of Relativity (Dover, New York, 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. L. Foldy and S. A. Wouthuysen,Phys. Rev. 78, 29 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  42. I thank Y. Aharonov for raising this question.

  43. M. Usher and L. P. Horwitz,Found. Phys. Lett. 4, 289 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. Saad, L. P. Horwitz, and R. I. Arshansky,Found. Phys. 19, 1125 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. M. Jauch,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. C. Land and L. P. Horwitz,Found. Phys. Lett. 4, 61 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. I. Arshansky, Tel Aviv University Report TAUP 1479–86, unpublished.

  48. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. I, Mechanics, 3rd edn. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On sabbatical leave from School of Physics and Astronomy, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horwitz, L.P. On the definition and evolution of states in relativistic classical and quantum mechanics. Found Phys 22, 421–450 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883906

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883906

Keywords

Navigation