Skip to main content
Log in

Bell-type inequalities in the nonideal case: Proof of a conjecture of bell

  • Part II. Invited Papers Dedicated To Henry Margenau
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently Bell has conjectured that, with “epsilonics,” one should be able to argue, à la EPR, from “almost ideal correlations” (in parallel Bohm-Bell pair experiments) to “almost determinism,” and that this should suffice to derive an approximate Bell-type inequality. Here we prove that this is indeed the case. Such an inequality—in principle testable—is derived employing only weak locality conditions, imperfect correlation, and a propensity interpretation of certain conditional probabilities. Outcome-independence (Jarrett's “completeness” condition), hence “factorability” of joint probabilities, is not assumed, but rather an approximate form of this is derived. An alternative proof to the original one of Bell [1971] constraining stochastic, contextual hidden-variables theories is thus provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Jeffrey Sanford Russell, John Hawthorne & Lara Buchak

References

  1. J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen paradox,”Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Hellman, “EPR, Bell, and collapse: a route around ‘stochastic’ hidden variables,”Philos. Sci. 54, 558–576 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Jarrett, “On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell arguments,”Noûs 18, 569–589 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. S. Bell, “Introduction to the hidden variables question,” in B. d'Espagnat, ed.,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Academic Press, New York, 1971), pp. 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, “Experimental consequences of objective local theories,”Phys. Rev. D 10, 526–535 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. F. Clauser and A. Shimony, “Bell's theorem: Experimental tests and implications,”Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1881–1927 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Selleri, “Generalized EPR paradox,”Found. Phys. 12(1), 645–659 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Hellman, “Stochastic Einstein locality and the Bell theorems,”Synthese 53(3), 461–504 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental tests of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, “Bell's theorem without inequalities,”Am. J. Phys. 58(12), 1131–1143 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellman, G. Bell-type inequalities in the nonideal case: Proof of a conjecture of bell. Found Phys 22, 807–817 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883744

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883744

Keywords

Navigation