Abstract
We consider the compatibility of the Wootters and Zurek development of information theory as applied to the two-slit experiment with the principle of complementarity. We also consider the limitations of aspects of Wootters and Zurek's analysis, and, independently of complementarity, the extent to which Wootters and Zurek's information theory can be considered a fundamental interpretation of the quantum theory (as applied to particle-wave duality). The question of particle-wave uncertainty relations will also be taken up.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974), pp. 121–132;
N. Bohr, “Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics,” inAlbert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist (Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1949), pp. 201–241.
W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, “Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum nonseperability and a quantitative statement of Bohr's principle,”Phys. Rev. D 19(2), 473 (1979).
P. Mittelstaedt, A. Prieur, and R. Schieder, “Unsharp particle-wave duality in a photon split beam experiment,”Found. Phys. 17(9), 891 (1987).
H. Rauch and J. Summhammer, “Static versus time-dependent absorption in neutron interferometry,”Phys. Lett. A 104(1), 44 (1984);
J. Summhammer, H. Rauch, and D. Tuppinger, “Stochastic and deterministic absorption in neutron-interference experiments,”Phys. Rev. A 36(9), 4447 (1987);
J. Summhammer, H. Rauch, and D. Tuppinger, “Stochastic and deterministic attenuation of one beam in the neutron interferometer,”Physica B 151, 103 (1988).
D. Home and P. N. Kaloyerou, “New twists to Einstein's two-slit experiment: complementarity vis-à-vis the causal interpretation,”J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, 3253 (1989).
M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics, 6th edn. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1987).
N. Bohr,Nature (London) 121, 78, 580 (1928);
N. Bohr,Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1934);
N. Bohr,Atomic Theory and Human Knowledge (Science Editions, New York, 1961).
D. M. Greenberger and A. Yasin, “Simultaneous wave and particle knowledge in a neutron interferometer,”Phys. Lett. A 128(8), 391 (1988).
P. N. Kaloyerou and H. R. Brown, “On neutron interferometer partial absorption experiments,”Physica B 176, 78 (1992).
D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables. I and II,”Phys. Rev. 85(2), 166, 180 (1952);
L. de Broglie,Non-Linear Wave Mechanics: A Causal Interpretation (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960).
C. Phillipides, C. Dewdney, and B. J. Hiley, “Quantum interference and the quantum potential,”Nuovo Cimento B 52(1), 15 (1979).
D. Bohm, B. J. Hiley, and P. N. Kaloyerou, “An ontological basis for the quantum theory,”Phys. Rep. 144(6), 323, 349 (1987).
P. N. Kaloyerou, “The causal interpretation of the electromagnetic field: The EPR experiment,” inBell's Theorem and the Foundations of Modern Physics, A. van der Merwe, F. Selleri, and G. Tarozzi, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaloyerou, P.N. On the Wootters-Zurek development of Einstein's two-slit experiment. Found Phys 22, 1345–1377 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883665
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883665