Summary
In contrast to the opinion of numerous authors (e.g. R. Rudner, P. Kitcher, L. R. Graham, M. Dummett, N. Chomsky, R. Lewontin, etc.) it is argued here that the formation of opinion in science should be greatly insulated from political considerations. Special attention is devoted to the view that methodological standards for evaluation of scientific theories ought to vary according to the envisaged political uses of these theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barber, B.: 1952,Science and the Social Order, Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Black, M.: 1978, ‘Scientific Neutrality’,Encounter, August.
Blalock, C. H. M., Jr.: 1972,Social Statistics (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Block, N. J. and G. Dworkin: ‘IQ, Heritability, and Inequality’, in N. Block and G. Dworkin (eds.),The IQ Controversy, New York: Random House.
Caplan, A. L.: 1980, ‘A Critical Examination of Current Sociobiological Theory: Adequacy and Implications’, in G. W. Barlow and J. Silverberg (eds.),Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture, Boulder: Westview Press.
Cargile, J.: 1966, ‘Pascal's Wager’,Philosophy 35.
Ceci, S. J., D. Peters, and J. Plotkin: 1985, ‘Human Subjects Review, Personal Values, and the Regulation of Social Science Research’,American Psychologist 40.
Chomsky, N.: 1976, ‘The Fallacy of Richard Herrnstein's IQ’, in N. Block and G. Dworkin (eds.),The IQ Controversy, New York: Random House.
Davis, B. D.: 1986,Storm Over Biology: Essays on Science, Sentiment, and Public Policy, Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
Dummett, D.: 1981, ‘Ought Research to Be Unrestricted?’,Grazer Philosophische Studien 12–13.
Elster, J. 1984,Ulysses and the Sirens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frankel C. (ed.): 1976,Controversies and Decisions, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gaa, J. G.: 1977, ‘Moral Autonomy and the Rationality of Science’,Philosophy of Science 44.
Gordon, R. A.: 1987, ‘Jensen's Contributions Concerning Test Bias: A Contextual View’, in S. Modgil and C. Modgil (eds.),Arthur Jensen: Consensus and Controversy, New York, Philadelphia &, London: The Falmer Press.
Gould, S. J.: 1981,The Mismeasure of Man, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gould, S. J.: 1987, ‘Jensen's Last Stand’, in hisAn Urchin in the Storm, New York & London: W. W. Norton.
Graham, L. R.: 1981,Between Science and Values, New York: Columbia University Press.
Hacking, I.: 1975,The Emergence of Probability, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henkel, R.: 1978,The Tests of Significance, Beverly Hills: The Sage Publications.
Jensen, A. R.: 1969, ‘How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement’,Harvard Educational Review 39.
Jensen, A. R.: 1972,Genetics and Education, London: Methuen.
Jensen, A. R.: 1973, ‘Between-groups Heritability’, in hisEducability and Group Differences, London: Methuen.
Jensen, A. R.: 1976, ‘Race and Intelligence: A Reply to Lewontin’, in N. Block and G. Dworkin (eds.),The IQ Controversy, New York: Random House.
Jensen, A. R.: 1981, ‘Obstacles, Problems, and Pitfalls in Differential Psychology’, in Scarr (1981).
Kamin, L. J.: 1974,The Science and Politics of I.Q., Potomac: Erlbaum.
Kantrowitz, A.: 1975, ‘Controlling Technology Democratically’,American Scientist 63.
Kitcher, P.: 1985,Vaulting Ambition, Cambridge, Mass. & London: The MIT Press.
Ladd, E. C. Jr. & S. M. Lipset: 1975,The Divided Academy: Professors and Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mackie, J. L.: 1982,The Miracle of Theism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Martin, N. and R. Jardine: 1986, ‘Eysenck's Contributions to Behaviour Genetics’, in S. Modgil and C. Modgil (eds.),Hans Eysenck: Consensus and Controversy, Philadelphia & London: The Falmer Press.
Mazur, A.: 1981,The Dynamics of Technical Controversy, Washington: Communications Press.
Richardson, R. C.: 1984, ‘Biology and Ideology: The Interpenetration of Science and Values’,Philosophy of Science 51.
Rose, S., R. Lewontin and L. J. Kamin: 1984,Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Rudner, R.: 1953, ‘The ScientistQua Scientist Makes value Judgments:Philosophy of Science 20.
Scarr, S.: 1981,Race, Social Class, and Individual Differences in I.Q., Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Snyderman M. and S. Rothman: 1986, ‘Science, Politics, and the IQ Controversy’,Public Interest, Spring, pp. 79–97.
Snyderman M. & S. Rothman: 1987, ‘Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence and Aptitude Testing’,American Psychologist 42.
Stent, G. S.: 1978,Paradoxes of Progress, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Wade, N.: 1978, ‘Sociobiology: Troubled Birth for New Discipline’, in A. Caplan (ed.),Sociobiology Debate, New York: Harper & Row.
Watson, J. D.: 1986, ‘Biology: A Necessary Limitless Vista’, in S. Rose & L. Appignanesi (eds.),Science and Beyond, Oxford & London: Blackwell.
Additional information
I wish to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for having supported the work on this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sesardić, N. Science and politics: Dangerous liaisons. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23, 129–151 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801799
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801799