Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative efficacy of ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime and gentamicin, given alone or in combination, in a model of experimental septicemia due to klebsiella pneumoniae in neutropenic mice

Therapeutische Aktivität von Ciprofloxacin, Ceftazidim und Gentamicin allein und in Kombination in einem Modell der experimentellen Klebsiella pneumoniae-Septikämie bei neutropenischen Mäusen

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The therapeutic efficacy of ciprofloxacin, used alone and in combination with either ceftazidime or gentamicin, was evaluated in a model of experimentalKlebsiella pneumoniae septicemia in neutropenic mice. Therapeutic results were compared to those achieved by treatment with ceftazidime or gentamicin alone, as well as their combination. Infections were induced by i.v. injection of two strains ofK. pneumoniae. Therapy with i.m. antibiotics was performed in 8 h intervals for a total of 13 doses, and survival rates were recorded at the end of treatment as well as seven days later. Ciprofloxacin alone proved to be significantly more effective than ceftazidime and gentamicin, producing survival rates similar to the combination of ceftazidime plus gentamicin. Bacterial counts of spleens and blood confirmed the superior bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin. Except for the combination of ciprofloxacin with ceftazidime, there was no apparent advantage of combinations of ciprofloxacin with the other agents compared to ciprofloxacin alone. These data suggest a highin vivo activity of ciprofloxacin in systemic infection due toK. pneumoniae.

Zusammenfassung

Die therapeutische Aktivität von Ciprofloxacin in Monotherapie und in Kombination mit Ceftazidim oder Gentamicin wurde in einem Modell der experimentellenKlebsiella pneumoniae-Septikämie bei neutropenischen Mäusen untersucht. Zum Vergleich dienten Versuchsgruppen, die mit Ceftazidim oder Gentamicin jeweils allein oder in Kombination behandelt wurden. Die Infektion erfolgte durch i.v. Injektion von zwei verschiedenen Stämmen vonK. pneumoniae. Zur i.m. Therapie wurden 13 Dosen der Antibiotika achtstündlich injiziert. Die Überlebensraten wurden am Ende der Behandlungsperiode und sieben Tage später ermittelt. Die therapeutische Aktivität von Ciprofloxacin entsprach, gemessen an den Überlebensraten, der Kombination aus Ceftazidim und Gentamicin, war jedoch signifikant höher als die Wirksamkeit beider Einzelsubstanzen. Dies wurde auch durch die Ermittlung der Bakterienzahlen in Milz und Blut bestätigt. Mit Ausnahme der Kombination aus Ciprofloxacin und Ceftazidim kam es bei Ciprofloxacin-Kombinationen zu keiner Wirkungssteigerung. Diese Daten weisen auf eine hoheIn vivo-Aktivität von Ciprofloxacin bei systemischenK. pneumoniae-Infektionen hin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Ljungman, P., Malmborg, A. S., Nyström, B., Tillegard, A. Bacteremia in a Swedish university hospital: a one-year prospective study in 1981 and a comparison with 1975–76. Infection 12 (1984) 243–247.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maki, D. G. Nosocomial bacteremia. An epidemiologic overview. Am. J. Med. 70 (1981) 719–732.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weinstein, M. P., Reller, L. B., Murphy, J. R., Lichtenstein, K. A. The significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev. Infect. Dis. 5 (1983) 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hable, K. A., Matsen, J. M., Wheeler, D. J., Hunt, C. E., Quie, P. G. Klebsiella type 33 septicemia in an infant intensive care unit. J. Pediatr. 80 (1972) 920–924.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, R. J., Roe, E. A., Gupta, J. L. Controlled trial of Pseudomonas immunoglobulin and vaccine in burn patients. Lancet II (1980) 1263–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Umsawasdi, T., Middleman, E. A., Luna, M., Bodey, G. P. Klebsiella bacteremia in cancer patients. Am. J. Med. Sci. 265 (1973) 473–482.

    Google Scholar 

  7. De la Torre, M. G., Romero-Visas, J., Martínez-Beltrán, J., Guerrero, A., Meseguer, M., Bouza, E. Klebsiella bacteremia: an analysis of 100 episodes. Rev. Infect. Dis. 7 (1985) 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Young, L. S., Stevens, P., Kaijser, B. Gram-negative pathogens in septicaemic infections. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 31 (1982) 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chin, N. X., Neu, H. C. Ciprofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compound active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 25 (1984) 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Caekenberghe, D. L., Pattyn, S. R. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin compared with those of other new fluorinated piperazinyl-substituted quinolone derivatives. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 25 (1984) 518–521.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chedid, L., Parant, M., Parant, F., Boyer, F. A proposed mechanism for natural immunity to enterobacterial pathogens. J. Immunol. 100 (1968) 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper, J. McA., Rowley, D. Resistance toKlebsiella pneumoniae and the importance of two bacterial antigens. Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. 60 (1982) 629–641.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trautmann, M., Müller-Leutloff, Y., Hofstaetter, T., Seiler, F. R., Hahn, H. Experimental Klebsiella septicemia in mice: treatment with specific antibodies from the rabbit alone and in combination with gentamicin. Infection 13 (1985) 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trautmann, M., Brückner, O., Marre, R., Hahn, H. Comparative efficacy of different β-lactam antibiotics and gentamicin inKlebsiella pneumoniae septicaemia in neutropenic mice. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (1986) 387–391.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haller, I. Comprehensive evaluation of ciprofloxacin-aminoglycoside combinations against Enterobacteriaceae andPseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28 (1985) 663–666.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haller, I. Comprehensive evaluation of ciprofloxacin in combination with β-lactam antibiotics against Enterobacteriaceae andPseudomonas aeruginosa. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 36 (1986) 226–229.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bodey, G. P., Chang, H. Y., Rodriguez, V., Stewart, D. Feasibility of administering aminoglycoside antibiotics by continuous infusion. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 8 (1975) 328–333.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brittain, D. C., Scully, B. E., McElrath, J., Steinman, R., Labthavikul, P., Neu, H. C. The pharmacokinetics and serum and urine bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 25 (1985) 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reeves, D. S., Bywater, M. J. Assay of antimicrobial agents. In:de Louvois, J. (ed.): Selected topics in clinical bacteriology. Baillière Tindall, London, 1976, pp 21–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lüthy, R., Blaser, J., Bonetti, A., Simmen, H., Wise, R., Siegenthaler, W. Comparative multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime, moxalactam and ceftazidime. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 21 (1981) 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wingender, W., Graefe, K. H., Gau, W., Förster, D., Beermann, D., Schacht, P. Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin after oral and intravenous administration in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 3 (1984) 355–359.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wise, R., Andrews, J. R., Edwards, L. J. In vitro activity of Bay 09867, a new quinolone derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 23 (1983) 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lagast, H., Husson, M., Klastersky, J. Bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin in serum and urine againstEscherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus andStreptococcus faecalis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 16 (1985) 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weiss, D., Trautmann, M., Wagner, J., Borner, K., Hahn, H.: Ciprofloxacin: a comparative evaluation of its bactericidal activity in human serum against four enterobacterial species. Drugs Exptl. Clin. Res. (in press).

  25. Strunk, R. W., Gratz, J. C., Maserati, R., Scheld, W. M. Comparison of ciprofloxacin with azlocillin plus tobramycin in the therapy of experimentalPseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28 (1985) 428–432.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gordin, F. M., Hackbarth, C. J., Scott, K. G., Sande, M. A. Activities of pefloxacin and ciprofloxacin in experimentally induced Pseudomonas pneumonia in neutropenic guinea pigs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 27 (1985) 452–454.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kemmerich, B., Small, G. J., Pennington, J. E. Comparative evaluation of ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, and ofloxacin in experimentalPseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 29 (1986) 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trautmann, M., Brückner, O., Marre, R. et al. Comparative efficacy of ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime and gentamicin, given alone or in combination, in a model of experimental septicemia due to klebsiella pneumoniae in neutropenic mice. Infection 16, 49–53 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646933

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646933

Keywords

Navigation