Skip to main content
Log in

Farmers helping farmers: Constituent services and the development of a grassroots farm lobby

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two major episodes of farm protest have occurred in the past decade. In each case, protesting farmers have chosen to create new farm organizations rather than express their grievances through one of many existing farm interest groups. The result has been the development of a durable grassroots farm lobby, a hybrid mode of exercising political influence that combines features of interest group lobbying and social movement protest. The first episode saw the mobilization of the American Agriculture Movement (AAM), a nation-wide protest organization devoted to achieving a federal guarantee of parity prices. When AAM's attempt to change federal farm policy failed, it was unable to sustain a high level of member mobilization or organizational activity. This failure is attributed to the lack of a stable organizational structure, the lack of durable membership incentives, and the counterproductive effects of disruptive protest tactics. The second episode of protest occurred in reaction to the farm-debt crisis of the 1980s. Protesting farmers organized numerous crisis groups to provide emergency services to financially distressed farmers. The crisis groups coalesced into the National Save the Family Farm Coalition (NSFFC) in order to exert influence over federal farm policy. It is argued that this coalition structure, along with membership incentives provided by crisis groups through their constituent service programs, may allow this latest farm movement to exert more considerable and durable influence over federal farm policy than AAM was able to do in the late 1970s. The problems of maintaining a national coalition of grassroots groups are discussed and evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alinsky, Saul D. 1949.Reveille for Radicals. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, William P. 1983. “Mobilizing and Activating Group Demands: The American Agriculture Movement.”Social Science Quarterly 64 (March): 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, William P. 1988.Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, William P. and John Dinse. 1985. “The Emergence of the American Agriculture Movement, 1977–79”.Great Plains Quarterly 5 (Fall): 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, William P. and Mark H. Lundgren. 1988. “Agrarian Protest and a Grassroots Lobby.” In William P. Browne,Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. Ch. 4.

  • Cigler, Allan J. 1986. “From Protest Group to Interest Group: The Making of the American Agriculture Movement, Inc.” In Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, (eds.),Interest Group Politics, second edition. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, Willard W. 1979.The Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fireman, Bruce and William A. Gamson. 1979. “Utilitarian Logic in the Resource Mobilization Perspective.” In Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy, (eds.),The Dynamics of Social Movements Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Fite, Gilbert. 1981.American Farmers: First Majority, Last Minority. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William. 1975.The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstader, Richard. 1955.The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstader, Richard. 1965.The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, Barbara A. 1979. “Farm Movement Ideology in the Late Seventies: The American Agriculture Movement.” Unpublished manuscript. Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.

  • Kohl, Barbara A. and William L. Flinn. 1979. “Farm Movement Ideology in the Late Seventies: The American Agriculture Movement.” Paper presented at the Rural Sociological Society Meeting, Burlington, Vermont.

  • Knutson, Ronald D., J. B. Penn, and William T. Boehm. 1983.Agricultural and Food Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin and Earl Raab. 1978.The Politics of Unreason, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, Mark H. “Cabalism and ‘Common Law’ in the Countryside: The Campaign by Right-Wing Radicals to Exploit the Farm Crisis.” Unpublished paper. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Iowa State University.

  • Olson, Mancur. 1965.The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Francis Fox and Richard Cloward. 1977.Poor People's Movements: How They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Norman. 1962.The Populist Response to Industrial America: Midwestern Populist Thought. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay Lehman and John T. Tierney. 1986.Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1978.From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten, Luther. 1987. “Sector as Personality: The Case of Farm Protest Movements.”Agriculture and Human Values. 4 (Winter): 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Bert, and Mayer N. Zald. 1982. “From Pressure Group to Social Movement: Organizational Dilemmas of the Effort to Promote Nuclear Power.”Social Problems 30 (December): 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Patricia, and Jess Gilbert. 1987. “Contested Ground: Hegemonic and Alternative Ideologies as Lived by Contemporary Midwestern Farmers.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Rural Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Westphal, David. 1987. “Farm Credit Bailout: The Activists Win.”Des Moines Sunday Register December, 13. Page 1.

  • Wilson, James Q. 1973.Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Notes 1. An earlier version of this paper was presented to the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society in August, 1987 at Madison, Wisconsin.

Mark Lundgren teaches in the Sociology Department at Iowa State University and works on the research staff of Prairiefire Rural Action. He is currently conducting research on the farm movement for his PhD dissertation.

William P. Browne is Professor of Political Science, Central Michigan University. His major area of research is the agricultural and rural policy process but he has done previous work in urban and aging policy. In addition to numerous articles, he has published a series of five books on agriculture and rural policy, as well as the recently publishedPrivate Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. In 1985–86 he was a visiting scholar with the Economic Research Service, USDA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Browne, W.P., Lundgren, M.H. Farmers helping farmers: Constituent services and the development of a grassroots farm lobby. Agric Hum Values 4, 11–28 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530638

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530638

Keywords

Navigation