Skip to main content
Log in

Questionnaire to evaluate the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to identify perceived difficulty and reduction of difficulty when using assistive devices and altered working methods in performing daily activities and to detect which activities were unaffected by interventions. Twenty-one women aged 29–65 years with rheumatoid arthritis answered the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire (EDAQ), which contains 102 items divided into 11 dimensions of daily activities. The women rated their perceived difficulty twice: first when not using devices or altered methods and then when using them. The use of devices or altered methods led to a reduction in perceived difficulty in 42% of the ratings. The number of items that the women found difficult when not using devices/altered methods ranged between 13 and 99. With the interventions, the number of items still found difficult decreased to between 6 and 57, 91% of the devices provided were still in use. The dimensions Eating, Cooking and Toileting contained the most items affected by the use of devices such as lever taps, springy scissors, breadknife and wrist orthosis. Few effective devices were identified for the dimensions Dressing, Washing, Cleaning and Mobility Outdoors. It was concluded that the EDAQ represents a new approach to demonstrating difficulties in performing various daily activities, to describing the effects of assistive devices/altered methods, and to identifying areas not affected by interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rasker JJ, Cosh JA. The natural history of rheumatoid arthritis over 20 years. Clinical symptoms, radiological signs, treatment, mortality and prognostic significance of early features. Clin Rheumatol 1987;6(suppl):5–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nordenskiöld U, Grimby G. Grip force in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia and in healthy subjects. A study with the Grippit instrument. Scand J Rheumatol 1993;22:14–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eberhardt K, Malcus-Johnson P. Rydgren L. The occurrence and significance of hand deformities in early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1991;30:211–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taal E, Rasker JJ, Seydel ER, Wiegman O. Health status, adherence problems, self-efficacy and social support in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients Educ Couns 1993;20:63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer A. The philosophy of occupational therapy. Arch Occup Ther 1972;1:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson I. The rehabilitation of patients with long-term physical impairments: the social context of professional roles. Clin Rehabil 1988;2:339–47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pincus T, Callahan LF, Vaughn WK. Questionnaire, walking time and button test measures of functional capacity as predictive markers for mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987;14:240–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organisation. International classification of impairment, disabilities and handicaps. A manual of classification relating to consequences of disease (ICIDH). Geneva: WHO, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berglund K, Persson LO. Dimensions of psychological adjustment to illness in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1990;19:311–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jette A. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Phys. Ther 1994:380–6.

  11. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994;38:1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz R, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardised measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:914–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hulter-Åsberg K, Sonn U. The cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL. A study of elderly people in a health service district. Scand J Rehabil Med 1989;21:171–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sonn U. Longitudinal studies of dependence in daily life activities among the elderly. Scand J Rehabil Md 1996(suppl):34.

  15. Meenan R, Mason J, Anderson J, Guccione A, Kazis L. AIMS 2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded. Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales health status questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:1–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jette A. The functional status index: reliability and validity of a selfreported functional disability measure. J Rheumatol 1987;14:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fries JF, Spitz P, Krainer G, Holman H. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fries JF. The assessment of disability: from first to future principles. Br J Rheumatol 1983;22 (suppl):48–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pincus T, Summey J, Soraci S, Wallston K, Hummon N. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983;26:1346–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers JC, Holm MB. Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:120–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nordenskiöld U, Althoff B, Hansen AM. Joint protection for active living. A guide. Stockholm: The Swedish Rheumatism Association, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liang MH, Jette AM. Measuring functional ability in chronic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1981;22:80–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nordenskiöld U, Grimby G, Hedberg M, Wright B, Linacre JM. The structure of an instrument for assessing the effect of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1996;9:21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steinbrocker O, Traeger CH, Batterman RC. Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA 1949;140:659–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Althoff B, Nordenskiöld U. Ioint protection for active living. Course booklet. Stockholm: The Swedish Rheumatism Association, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;140:857–60.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ekdahl C, Eberhardt K, Andersson SI, Svensson B. Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol 1988;17:263–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eberhardt K, Svensson B, Moritz U. Functional assessment of early rheumatcid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1988;27:364–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sollerman C. Assessment of grip function: evaluation of a new test method [dissertation]. Göteborg: University Göteborg, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nordenskiöld U. Evaluation of assistive devices after a course in joint protection. Int J Technol Assessment Health Care 1994;10:293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Guillemin F, Briancon S, Pourel J. Validity and discriminant ability of the HAQ Functional Index in early rheumatoid arthritis. Disabil Rehabil 1992;14:71–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Svensson E. Analysis of systematic and random differences between paried ordinal categorical data [dissertation]. Göteborg: University of Göteborg, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fitinghoff H, Söderback I, Nordemar R. An activity analysis of hand grips used in housework by female rheumatoid arthritics. Work 1994;4:128–36.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mann W, Hurren D, Tomita M. Assistive devices used by homebased elderly persons with arthritis. Am J Occup Ther 1995;49:810–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Benktzon M. Designing for our future selves: the Swedish experience. Appl Ergonom 1993;24:19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nordenfelt L. On the notion of disability and handicap. Scand J Soc Welfare 1993;2:17–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nordenskiöld, U., Grimby, G. & Dahlin-Ivanoff, S. Questionnaire to evaluate the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 17, 6–16 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01450952

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01450952

Key words

Navigation