, Volume 144, Issue 4, pp 559-566

Adaptive echolocation sounds in the batRhinopoma hardwickei

Purchase on Springer.com

$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Summary

  1. Rhinopoma hardwickei were studied under natural conditions in the Madurai region of southern India.

  2. Frequency modulated (FM) sounds of 3 ms duration were emitted shortly before landing and during times when 10–70 individuals were flying in clusters as they left their roosts.

  3. Constant frequency (CF) sounds of 48 ms duration were produced in open space by single flying bats and by bats flying in a group. At these times the most intense component was the second harmonic.

  4. When bats flew in a group the frequencies of the CF-sounds emitted by different individuals were in three different bands (30.0, 32.5, and 35.0 kHz) whereas single flying bats used only 32.5 kHz. Evidence is presented that shows thatRhinopoma hardwickei flying in groups regulate the frequency of their individual CF-components and in this way they avoid jamming one another.

  5. After landing a pure tone multi-harmonic sound of long duration (maximally 100ms) is emitted. In this sound the fundamental frequency is dominant. Its significance, either communicative and/or echolocative, is not clear.

  6. The possible role of different types of sounds recorded in different orientation situations is discussed.

As a part of the ‘Indo-German Project on Animal Behaviour’ this study was supported by the University Grants Commision of India, a Government of India Scholarship, and Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 45) and the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst. I thank Professor S. Krishnaswamy for offering the facilities of the School of Biological Sciences, Professor M.K. Chandrashekaran for supporting the fieldwork, G. Marimuthu and Dr. A. Wason for assistance in the field, and Ms. E. Daniel and Ms. M. Kreuder for technical help. Many thanks as well to Professor O.W. Henson and Professor G. Neuweiler for many fruitful discussions and critical remarks to the manucript.