Skip to main content
Log in

Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers

Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although esophageal manometry is widely used in clinical practice, the normal range of esophageal contraction parameters is poorly defined. Therefore, 95 healthy volunteers (mean age: 43 years; range 22–79 years) were studied with a low-compliance infusion system and 4.5-mm-diameter catheter. All subjects were given 10 wet swallows (5 cc H2O) and 38 subjects also were given 10 dry swallows. Results: Amplitude, but not duration, was greater (P<0.05) after wet compared to dry swallows. Both distal mean contractile amplitude and duration of wet swallows significantly increased with age and peaked in the fifties. Double-peaked waves frequently occurred after both wet (11.3%) and dry (18.1%) swallows, but triple-peaked waves were rare (<1%). Nonperistaltic contractions were more common (P<0.001) after dry compared to wet swallows (18.1% vs 4.1%). This difference resulted from frequent simultaneous contractions after dry swallows (12.6% vs 0.4%). Conclusions: (1) Distal esophageal contractile amplitude and duration after wet swallows increases with age. (2) Triple-peaked waves and wet-swallow-induced simultaneous contractions should suggest an esophageal motility disorder. Double-peaked waves are a common variant of normal. (3) Dry swallows have little use in the current evaluation of esophageal peristalsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arndorfer R: Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometrics. Gastroenterology 73:23–27, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nagler R, Spiro HM: Serial esophageal motility studies in asymptomatic young subjects. Gastroenterology 41:371–379, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hellemans J, Vantrappen G, Janssens J, Pelmans W, Valembois D: Function of the Esophagus, 1st ed. Brussels, Odense University Press 1973, pp 38–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Reid DP, Stewart EI, Arndorfer RC: A comparison between primary esophageal peristalsis following wet and dry swallows. J Appl Physiol 354:851–857, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hollis JB, Castell DO: Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis. J Appl Physiol 38:1161–1164, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Stef JJ, Miller WN, Lydon SB, Arndorfer RC: A rapid pull-through technique for measuring lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Gastroenterology 68:437–442, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clouse RE, Staiano A: Contraction abnormalities of the esophageal body in patients referred for manometry: A new approach to manometric classification. Dig Dis Sci 28:784–791, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richter JE, Blackwell JN, Wu WC, Cowan RJ, Johns DN, Castell DO: Assessment of liquid bolus transit by simultaneous radionuclide transit and esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 24:1284A, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ingelfinger FJ: Esophageal motility. Physiol Rev 38:533–584, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaye MD, Wexler RM: Alteration of esophageal peristalsis by body position. Dig Dis Sci 26:897–901, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hollis JB, Castell DO: Esophageal function in elderly men. A new look at “presbyesophagus”. Ann Intern Med 80:371–374, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benjamin SB, Gerhardt DC, Castell DO: High-amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain and/or dysphagia. Gastroenterology 77:478–483, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson JL, Wu WC, Richter JE, Blackwell NJ, Johns DN, Castell DO: What is normal esophageal motility? Gastroenterology 84:1285A, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richter JE, Sinar D, Cordova C, Castell DO: Verapamil—a potent inhibition of esophageal contractions in the baboon. Gastroenterology 82:882–886, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loo FD, Dodds WJ, Soergel KH, Arndorfer RC, Helm JF, Hogan WF: Multipeaked esophageal peristaltic pressure waves in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Gastroenterology 88:485–491, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davies HA, Kaye MD, Rhoades J, Dart AM, Henderson AH: Diagnosis of oesophageal spasm by ergometrine provocation. Gut 23:89–97, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richter JE, Castell DO: Diffuse esophageal spasm: A reappraisal. Ann Intern Med 100:242–245, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gillies M, Nick R, Skyring A: Clinical, manometric, and pathological studies in diffuse oesophageal spasm. Br Med J 2:527–530, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  19. Welch RW, Drake ST: Normal lower esophageal sphincter: A comparison of rapid vs slow pull-through techniques. Gastroenterology 78:1446–1451, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH, Sekiguchi T, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC, Petrie DJ: Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J Clin Invest 65:256–267, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boyle JT, Altschuler SM, Nixon TE, Tuchman DN, Pack AI, Cohn S: Role of the diaphragm in the genesic of lower esophageal sphincter pressure in the cat. Gastroenterology 88:723–730, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  22. Csendes A, Guiraldes E, Bancalari A, Braghetto I, Ayloa M: Relation of gastroesophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal contractile waves to age in man. Scand J Gastroenterol 13:443–447, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lydon SB, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC: The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording. Dig Dis Sci 20:968–970, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  24. Petersen JM, Traube M, Magyar L, McCallum RW: Segmental esophageal aperistalsis as a cause of chest pain and/or dysphagia. Gastroenterology 88:1538A, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dodds WJ, Steff JJ, Hogan WJ: Factors determining pressure measurement accuracy by intraluminal esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 70:117–123, 1976

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richter, J.E., Wu, W.C., Johns, D.N. et al. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Digest Dis Sci 32, 583–592 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296157

Key Words

Navigation