Skip to main content
Log in

Light- and electron-microscopic studies of growth and reproduction inCutleria (phaeophyta)

II. Gametogenesis in the male plant ofC. hancockii

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Development of the plurilocular male gametangium inCutleria hancockii Dawson is fundamentally similar to that of the female gametangium. However, the sequence of mitoses is less regular and the number of divisions is more variable in the male structure. During mitosis the nucleolus disappears and the nuclear envelope breaks down into vesicles and cisternae. No well-defined chromosomal kinetochores were observed. The spindle does not persist during telophase. At least two types of vesicles, but no microtubules, are associated with cytokinesis. After cleavages are completed, each of the cells develops an eyespot and two flagella. The flagellar rootlet system consists of 4–5 bands of 5–10 microtubules radiating posteriorly from the basal bodies. Flocculent material surrounding the gamete at maturity may be involved with liberation. Prior to release, a pore is formed in each locule when the outermost layers of the surficial wall break, and the innermost layers expand out through this weakened region. The inner wall eventually bursts, releasing the gamete and flocculent material through the pore. The liberated gamete has a long, pleuronematic anterior flagellum, and a short, acronematic posterior flagellum which has a swollen base appressed to the plasmalemma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkaloff, C., 1963: Les cellules méristématiques d'Himanthalia lorea (L.) S. F. Gray. Étude au microscope électronique. J. Microscopie2, 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouck, G. B., 1969: Extracellular microtubules. The origin, structure, and attachment of flagellar hairs inFucus andAscophyllum antherozoids. J. Cell Biol.40, 446–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970: The development and postfertilization fate of the eyespot and the apparent photoreceptor inFucus sperm. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.175, 673–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawley, S. H., Quatrano, R. S., Wetherbee, R., 1977: Fine-structural studies of the gametes and embryo ofFucus vesiculosus L. (Phaeophyta). III. Cytokinesis and the multicellular embryo. J. Cell Sci.24, 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caram, B., 1975: Aspects ultrastructuraux de la spermatogenèse chez leCutleria adspersa (Phéophycées, Cutlériales) de la côte méditerranéenne française. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris)281 (D), 1089–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: The ultrastructure of the female gamete inCutleria adspersa (Mert.) De Not. (Phaeophyceae, Cutleriales). J. Phycol.13 (Suppl.), 11 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. M., Ferrier, N. C., Johnston, C. S., 1973: The ultrastructure of the meristoderm cells of the hapteron ofLaminaria. J. mar. biol. Ass. (U.K.)53, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, M. A., Hallam, N. D., 1979: Embryogenesis and substratum adhesion in the brown algaHormosira banksii (Turner) Decaisne. Brit. Phycol. J.14, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P., 1975: The role of membranes in the organization of the mitotic apparatus. Exp. Cell Res.94, 409–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayat, M. A., 1975: Positive staining for electron microscopy, 361 pp. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepler, P. K., 1977: Membranes in the spindle apparatus: their possible role in the control of microtubule assembly. In: Mechanisms and control of cell division (Rost, T. L., Gifford, E. M., Jr., eds.), pp. 212–232. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Palevitz, B. A., 1974: Microtubules and microfilaments. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.25, 309–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczewski, E., 1883: Note sur la fécondation duCutleria adspersa et les affinités des Cutlériées. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Ser. 6)16, 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckuck, P., 1929: Fragmente einer Monographie der Phaeosporeen. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch. Abt. Helgoland17 (4), 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Claire, J. W., II, West, J. A., 1977: Virus-like particles in the brown algaStreblonema. Protoplasma93, 127–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1978: Light- and electron-microscopic studies of growth and reproduction inCutleria (Phaeophyta). I. Gametogenesis in the female plant ofC. hancockii. Protoplasma97, 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedale, G. F., 1970: Phylogenetic aspects of nuclear cytology in the algae. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.175, 429–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofthouse, P. F., Capon, B., 1975: Ultrastructural changes accompanying mitosporogenesis inEctocarpus parvus. Protoplasma84, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loiseaux, S., West, J. A., 1970: Brown algal mastigonemes: comparative ultrastructure. Trans. amer. microsc. Soc.89, 524–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, I., Clarke, B., 1951: An electron microscope study of the spermatozoid ofFucus serratus. Ann. Bot. (N.S.)15, 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markey, D. R., Wilce, R. T., 1975: The ultrastructure of reproduction in the brown algaPylaiella littoralis. I. Mitosis and cytokinesis in the plurilocular gametangia. Protoplasma85, 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J., 1973: Growth media — marine. In: Handbook of phycological methods. Culture methods and growth measurements (Stein, J. R., ed.), pp. 25–51. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, D. G., 1965: Bemerkung zum Bau der Geißeln von Braunalgenschwärmern. Naturwiss.52, 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974: Sexual reproduction and isolation of a sex attractant inCutleria multifida (Smith) Grev. (Phaeophyta). Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen165, 212–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neushul, M., Dahl, A. L., 1972: Ultrastructural studies of brown algal nuclei. Amer. J. Bot.59, 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. B., Caram, B., Hansen, J. B., 1958: Observations sur les zoïdes duChordaria flagelliformis au microscope électronique. Bot. Tidskr.54, 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps, J. D., 1969: The evolution of the mitotic apparatus: an attempt at comparative ultrastructural cytology in dividing plant cells. Cytobios1, 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlence, D. J., 1973: Some aspects of the ultrastructure ofAscophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis (Phaeophyceae, Fucales) including observations on cell plate formation. Phycologia12, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scagel, R. F., 1966: ThePhaeophyceae in perspective. Oceanogr. mar. biol. Ann. Rev.4, 123–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuret, G., 1850: Recherches sur les zoospores des algues et les anthéridies des cryptogames. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Ser. 3)14, 214–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, R., 1976: A mechanism of propagule release from unilocular reproductive structures in brown algae. Protoplasma89, 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanouchi, S., 1909: Cytology ofCutleria andAglaozonia. A preliminary paper. Bot. Gaz.48, 380–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1912: The life history ofCutleria. Bot. Gaz.54, 441–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1913: The life history ofZanardinia. Bot. Gaz.56, 1–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

La Claire, J.W., West, J.A. Light- and electron-microscopic studies of growth and reproduction inCutleria (phaeophyta). Protoplasma 101, 247–267 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01276967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01276967

Keywords

Navigation