Abstract
Neptune and Pluto were discovered because of predictions derived from the differences between the observations and ephemerides of Uranus, but Pluto wasn't the predicted planet and the discrepancies still exist. This continuing existence of systematic differences between the observations and ephemerides of Uranus and Neptune has led to predictions of a Planet X. The demise of the dinosaurs and the existence of comets have been cited as additional evidence for another celestial object.
Therefore, possible bodies have been hypothesized in the outer part of the solar system, or out beyond the solar system, including a binary companion, Nemesis. The theory of relativity and the incompleteness of the law of gravity have also been suggested as explanations for the outer planet discrepancies. Predictions of the possible locations of planet X have been made, with rather large uncertainties, and selected searches of some regions have yielded nothing. IRAS and Pioneer observations exist as additional sources of useful observational data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Airy, G. B.: 1832, “Reports of British Association”, I, 154.
Airy, G. B.: 1846, Royal Astr. Soc. Month Not.7, 9, 121.
Anderson, J. D. and Standish, E. M.: 1986, “Dynamical Evidence for Planet-X”, The Galaxy and the Solar System, edited by R. Smoluchowski, J. Bahcall and M. Matthew, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Bennett, J. A.: 1981, “The Discovery of Uranus” Sky and Telescope, March 1981.
Bessel, F. W.: 1824, Astron Nachrechten 2 Nr., 48, 441.
Bouvard, A.: 1821, Conn. des Temps p. 341, 342.
Challis, J.: 1846, “Special Report of Proceedings in the Observatory Relative to the New Planet”, Cambridge Observatory.
Christy, J. W. and Harrington, R. S.: 1978, “The Satellite of Pluto”, Astron J.83, 1005–1008.
Clube, S. V. M. and Napier, W. M.: 1984, “Terrestrial catastrophism-Nemesis or Galaxy”, Nature311, 635–636.
Corbin, T. E.: 1980, “Systematic Reductions of 19th Century Planetary Observations”, Celestial Mechanic22, 25.
Duncombe, R. L. and Seidelmann, P. K.: 1980, “A history of the Determination of Pluto's Mass”, Icarus41, 12–18.
Eckert, W. J., Brouwer, D., and Clemence, G. M.: 1951, Astron. Papers of American Ephemeris XII.
Gaillot, M.: 1910, Annals of the Paris Observatory,28,
Gould, B. A.: 1850, “Report on the History of the Discovery of Neptune”, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C..
Gomes, R. S. and Ferraz-Mello, S.: 1988 “Would a Planet X Explain the Discrepancies in the Motions of Uranus and Neptune?” in press.
Grosser, M.: 1979, “The Discovery of Neptune”, Dover Publications Inc., New York.
Harrington, R. S.: 1988, “The location of Planet X”, in press.
Heisler, J. and Tremaine, S.: 1986, “The influence of the Galactic Tidal Field on the Oort Comet Cloud”, Icarus65, 13–26.
Heisler, J., Tremaine, S. and Alcock, L.: 1987, “The frequency and Intensity of Comet Showers from the Oort Cloud”, Icarus70, 269–288.
Hills, J. G.: 1984, “Dynamical constraints on the mass and perihelion distances of Nemesis and the stability of its orbit”, Nature311, 636–638.
Hills, J. G.: 1985, “The passage of a “Nemesis” like object through the Planetary System”, Astron. J.,90, 1876–1882.
Hoyt, W. G.: 1980, “Planet X and Pluto”, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.
Hut, P.: 1984, “How stable is an astronomical clock that can trigger mass extinctions on Earth?”, Nature311, 638–642.
Kowal, C. T. and Drake, S.: 1980, “Galileo's Observations of Neptune”, Nature287, 311–3.
LeVerrier, U. J.: 1845, Comptes Rendus XXI, 1050.
Lowell, P.: 1915, “Memoirs on A Trans-Neptunian Planet”, Memoires of the Lowell Observatory,1, 1.
Matese, J.J. and Whitmire, D.P.: 1986, “Planet X and the Origins of the Shower and Steady State Flux of Short-Period Comets”, Icarus65, 37–50.
Mauvais, V.: 1847, Compt. Rend.24, 666.
Morgan, H. R. and Lyons, U. S.: 1930, “On the tables of Uranus and Neptune”, Astr. J.40, 97.
Morris, D. E. and Muller, R. A.: 1986, “Tidal Gravitational Forces: The Infall of “New” Comets and Comet Showers”, Icarus65, 1–12.
Newcomb, S.: 1867, “An Investigation of the Orbit of Neptune with General Tables of its motion”, Smithsonian contributions to Knowledge, City of Washington.
Newcomb, S.: 1898, “Tables of Neptune, Tables of Uranus”, Astronomical Papers of the American Ephemeris VII.
Raup, D. M. and Sepkoski, J. J.: 1984, “Perodicity of Extinctions in the Geologic Past.”, Proc Natn Acad Science, USA81, 801–806.
Pickering., W. H.: 1909, “A search for a Planet Beyond Neptune”, Annuals of the Astronimical Observatory of Harvard College LXI, pt II, Cambridge, MA.
Pickering, W. H.: 1928, “The Orbit of Uranus”, Popular Astronomy XXXVI, 353.
Pickering, W. H.: 1931, “Planet P. Its Orbit, Position and Magnitude. Planets S and T”, Popular Astronomy XXXIV, 385.
Powell, Conley: 1988, “A Mathematical Search for Planet X”, in press.
Seidelmann, P. K. and Duncombe, R. L.: 1982, “Problems concerning the Outer Planets', Dynamical Astronomy edited by B. A. Balazs and V. Szebehely, Budapest.
Seidelmann, P. K., Santoro, E. J., Pulkkinen, K. F.: 1985, “Systematic Differences between Planetary Observations and Ephemerides”, Dynamical Astronomy, Proceedings of the Second U.S.-Hungary Workshop, edited by Victor G. Szebehely and Bela Balazs, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Tombaugh, C. W. and Moore P.: 1980, “Out of the Darkness: The Planet Pluto”, Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA.
Tombaugh, C. W.: 1961, “The Trans-Neptunian Planet Search”, Planets and Satellites edited by G. P. Kuiper and B. M. Middlehurst, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
Torbett, M. V.: 1986, “Dynamical Influence of Galactic Tides and Molecular Clouds on the Oort Cloud of Comets”, The Galaxy and the Solar System, edited by R. Smoluchiwski, J. Bahcall and M. Matthew, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Walker, S. C.: 1847, “Elements of the Planet Neptune”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society4, 332–335.
Walker, S. C.: 1847, “Elliptic elements of the planet Neptune”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society4, 378.
Whitmire, D. P. and Matese, J. J.: 1985, “Periodic comet showers and Planet-X”, Nature313, 36–38.
Wylie, L. R.: 1942, “A Comparison of Newcomb's Tables of Neptune with Observations 1795–1938”, Publ. U. S. Naval Observatory15 part 1.
Whyte, A. J.: 1980, “The Planet Pluto”, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seidelmann, P.K., Harrington, R.S. Planet X — The current status. Celestial Mechanics 43, 55–68 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234554
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234554