Skip to main content
Log in

Cohabitation before marriage

A comparison of married couples who did and did not cohabit

  • Published:
Alternative Lifestyles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares 159 married couples who had or had not lived together previous to marriage with respect to a number of demographic and personality variables. There were few differences between the two groups on background variables but many on personality traits. Males who had cohabited perceived themselves as more androgynous, attractive, and less religious than males who did not cohabit. Females who cohabited saw themselves as more interested in art, attractive, extroverted, intelligent, liberal, androgynous, and having more leadership qualities; while being less religious, clothes-conscious, and law-abiding than women who did not cohabit. Couples who cohabited showed significantly greater sexual experimentation and self-perception accuracy than the couples who did not cohabit. Cohabitors revealed some background and trait within-group differences as a function of the length of their cohabital experiences. The majority of differences between the groups were in terms of variables assessed on the females. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARAFAT, I. and B. YORBURG (1973) “On living together without marriage.” J. of Sex Research 9: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENTLER, P. M. (1972) “The multimethod existence of 29 personality dimensions: data for the situation versus trait controversy.” Presented at the annual convention of the Western Psychological Association, Portland, Oregon.

  • —— (1968a) “Heterosexual behavior assessment—I. males.” Behavior Research and Therapy 6: 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1968b) “Heterosexual behavior assessment—II. females.” Behavior Research and Therapy 6: 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— and M. D. NEWCOMB (1978) “Longitudinal study of marital success and failure.” J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46: 1053–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWER, D. W. (1975) “A description and analysis of a cohabiting sample in America.” Master's thesis, University of Arizona. (unpublished)

  • —— and V. A. CHRISTOPHERSON (1977) “University student cohabitation: a regional comparison of selected attitudes and behavior.” J. of Marriage and the Family 39: 447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLAYTON, R. R. and H. L. VOSS (1977) “Shacking up: cohabitation in the 1970's.” J. of Marriage and the Family 39: 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLE, C. L. (1977) “Cohabitation in social context,” in R. Libby and R. Whitehurst (eds.) Marriage and Alternatives: Exploring Intimate Relationships. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • HENZE, L. F. and J. W. HUDSON (1974) “Personal and family characteristics of non-cohabiting and cohabiting college students.” J. of Marriage and the Family 36: 722–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • HILL, C., Z. RUBIN, L. PEPLAU, and S. WILLARD (1979) “The volunteer couple commitment and participation in research on interpersonal relationships.” Social Psychology Q., in press.

  • HOBART, C. W. (1979) “Changes in courtship and cohabitation in Canada, 1968–1977,” in M. Cook and G. Wilson (eds.) Love and Attraction. Oxford, England: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEWIS, R. A. and E. C. GUITTAR (1974) “Self-concepts among some unmarried cohabitants.” Presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, St. Louis.

  • —— G. B. SPANIER, V. L. ATKINSON, and C. F. LeHECKA (1977) “Commitment in married and unmarried cohabitation.” Soc. Focus 10: 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • LYNESS, J. L., M. LIPETZ, and K. DAVIS (1972) “Living together: an alternative to marriage.” J. of Marriage and the Family 34: 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • MACKLIN, E. D. (1978) “Review of research on non-marital cohabitation in the United States,” in B. I. Murstein (ed.) Exploring Intimate Lifestyles. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1976) “Unmarried heterosexual cohabitation on the university campus,” in J. P. Wiseman (ed.) The Social Psychology of Sex. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1972) “Heterosexual cohabitation among unmarried college students.” The Family Coordinator 21: 463–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILARDO, R. and B. MURSTEIN (1979) “The implications of exchange orientation on the dyadic functioning of heterosexual cohabitors,” in M. Cook and G. Wilson (eds.) Love and Attraction. Oxford, England: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEPLAU, A. (1979) Personal communication regarding unpublished analyses of data from the Boston Couples Project.

  • PETERMAN, D. J., C. A. RIDLEY, and S. M. ANDERSON (1974) “A comparison of cohabiting and non-cohabiting college students.” J. of Marriage and the Family 36: 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIDLEY, C. A., D. J. PETERMAN, and A. W. AVERY (1978) “Cohabitation: does it make for a better marriage?” Family Coordinator 27: 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCANZONI, J. (1972) Sexual Bargaining. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • STAFFORD, R., E. BACKMAN, and P. DiBONA (1977) “The division of labor among cohabiting and married couples.” J. of Marriage and the Family 39: 43–57,

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1977) “Marital status and living arrangements: March 1976. Current Population Reports. Series P-20, No. 306. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITEHURST, R. (1974) “Sex role equality and changing meanings in cohabitation.” Windsor, Ontario, Canada: University of Windsor. (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  • YLLO, K. A. (1978) “Nonmarital cohabitation beyond the college campus.” Alternative Lifestyles 1: 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Authors' Note: This investigation was supported in part by a Research Scientist Development Award (K02-DA00017) and a research grant (DA01070) from the U.S. Public Health Service. The assistance of Deborah Cabin is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newcomb, M.D., Bentler, P.M. Cohabitation before marriage. J Fam Econ Iss 3, 65–85 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083030

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083030

Keywords

Navigation