Skip to main content
Log in

Focal points in pure coordination games: An experimental investigation

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports an experimental investigation of the hypothesis that in coordination games, players draw on shared concepts of salience to identify ‘focal points’ on which they can coordinate. The experiment involves games in which equilibria can be distinguished from one another only in terms of the way strategies are labelled. The games are designed to test a number of specific hypotheses about the determinants of salience. These hypotheses are generally confirmed by the results of the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacharach, M.: 1991, ‘Games with Concept-Sensitive Strategy Spaces’. Paper presented at International Conference on Game Theory, Florence; forthcoming in K. Binmoreet al. (Eds.),Frontiers of Game Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  • Cooper, R. W., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R. and Ross, T. W.: 1990, ‘Selection Criteria in Coordination Games’,American Economic Review 80, 218–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, V.: 1991, ‘An “Evolutionary” Interpretation of Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil's Experimental Results on Coordination’,Games and Economic Behavior 3, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, V. and Haller, H.: 1990, ‘Learning How to Cooperate: Optimal Play in Repeated Coordination Games’,Econometrica 58, 571–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1975, ‘Coordination’,Dialogue 14, 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M.: 1989a, ‘Rationality and Salience’,Philosophical Studies 57, 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M.: 1989b,On Social Facts, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. and Selten, R.: 1988,A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J.: 1978, ‘Common Knowledge’,Philosophical Quarterly 28, 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1740,A Treatise of Human Nature, page references to 1978 edition published by Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. and Thaler, R.: 1986, ‘Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics’,Journal of Business 59, s285-s300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandori, M., Mailath, G. J. and Rob, R.: ‘Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games’,Econometrica 61, 29–56.

  • Kreps, D. M.: 1990,A Course in Microeconomic Theory, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1969,Convention: A Philosophical Study, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponssard, J.-P.: 1990, ‘Self Enforceable Paths in Extensive Form Games’,Theory and Decision 29, 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. and Murnighan, M.: 1982, ‘The Role of Information in Bargaining: An Experimental Study’,Econometrica 50, 1123–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.: 1960,The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R.: 1986,The Economics of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R.: 1991, ‘Rational Choice: A Survey of Contributions from Economics and Philosophy’,Economic Journal 101, 751–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R.: 1993, ‘Thinking as a Team: Towards an Explanation of Nonselfish Behavior’,Social Philosophy and Policy 10, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme, E.: ‘Stable Equilibria and Forward Induction’,Journal of Economic Theory 48, 476–496.

  • Van Huyck, J., Battalio, R. and Beil, R.: 1990, ‘Tacit Coordination Games, Strategic Uncertainty, and Coordination Failure’,American Economic Review 80, 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. P.: ‘The Evolution of Conventions’,Econometrica 61, 57–84.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, J., Starmer, C. & Sugden, R. Focal points in pure coordination games: An experimental investigation. Theor Decis 36, 163–185 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079211

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079211

Keywords

Navigation