Skip to main content
Log in

Rationality and reflective equilibrium

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cohen (1981) and others have made an interesting argument for the thesis that humans are rational: normative principles of reasoning and actual human reasoning ability cannot diverge because both are determined by the same process involving our intuitions about what constitutes good reasoning as a starting point. Perhaps the most sophisticated version of this argument sees reflective equilibrium as the process that determines both what the norms of reasoning are and what actual cognitive competence is. In this essay, I will evaluate both the general argument that humans are rational and the reflective equilibrium argument for the same thesis. While I find both accounts initially appealing, I will argue that neither successfully establishes that humans are rational.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Berwick, R., and A. Weinberg: 1980,The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capablanca, J. R.: 1965,My Chess Career, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., and N. Hildebrandt: 1988,Disorders of Syntactic Comprehension, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherniak, C.: 1986,Minimal Rationality, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherniak, C.: 1988, ‘Undebuggability and Cognitive Science’,Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 31, 402–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986,Knowledge of Language, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1988,Language and Problems of Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J.: 1981, ‘Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 317–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J.: 1986,The Dialogue of Reason, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E., and R. Feldman: 1983, ‘Stich and Nisbett on Justifying Inference Rules’,Philosophy of Science 50, 326–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L.: 1989, ‘The Logic of Selection: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task’,Cognition 31, 1187–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N.: 1979, ‘Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics’,Journal of Philosophy 76, 256–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N.: 1980a, ‘On Some Methods of Ethics and Linguistics’,Philosophical Studies 37, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N.: 1980b, ‘Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Archimedean Points’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10, 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1984,Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C.: 1987,The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O.: 1984,The Science of the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1981, ‘Three Cheers for Propositional Attitudes’, inRepresentations, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 100–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J.: 1988, ‘Review of John Macnamara'sA Border Dispute’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 53, 314–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G.: 1991a, ‘How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”’,European Review of Social Psychology 2, 83–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G.: 1991b, ‘On Cognitive Illusions and Rationality’, in E. Eells and T. Maruszewski (eds.),Probability and Rationality: Studies in L. Jonathan Cohen's Philosophy of Science, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 225–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.: 1986,Epistemology and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1983,Fact, Fiction and Forecast, 4th ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1987, ‘The Limits of Adaptation: Is Language a Spandrel of the Human Brain?’, talk presented to the Cognitive Science Seminar, Center for Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, M.: 1962, ‘On the Relation Between Logic and Thinking’,Psychological Review 69, 376–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, M.: 1978, ‘Foreword’, in R. Revlin and R. E. Mayer (ed.),Human Reasoning, Winston, Washington D.C., pp. xiii-xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1990, ‘The Evolution of Cognition’, in D. Osherson and E. Smith (eds.),Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 3, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 229–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W.: 1988, ‘Epistemic Value’, inJudgement and Justification, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 128–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, W.: 1986,The Disappearance of Introspection, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J.: 1986,A Border Dispute, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow, K. I., and D. E. Over: 1990,Inference and Understanding: A Philosophical and Psychological Perspective, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.: 1984, ‘Naturalist Reflections on Knowledge’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65, 315–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D.: 1987,Reality and Representation, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D.: 1984,Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M.: 1989, ‘Evolution, Selection and Cognition’,Cognition 31, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., and P. Bloom: 1990, ‘Natural Language and Natural Selection’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 707–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1984, ‘Evolutionary Epistemology’, in J. W. Pollard (ed.),Evolutionary Theory: Paths into the Future, Wiley and Sons, London, pp. 239–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, inMind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1961, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, inFrom a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1969, ‘Natural Kinds’, inOntological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 114–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O., and J. S. Ullian: 1970,The Web of Belief, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971,A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1974/1975, ‘The Independence of Moral Theory’,Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1978, ‘Psychologism’,Journal of Social Behavior 8, 165–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1981, ‘Evolution of Rationality’, Synthese46, 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E.: 1991,Rationality and the Limits of Cognitive Science, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S.: 1966, ‘High-speed Scanning in Human Memory’,Science 153, 652–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S.: 1990,Fragmentation of Reason, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S., and R. Nisbett: 1980, ‘Justification and the Psychology of Human Reasoning’,Philosophy of Science 47, 188–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman: 1983, ‘Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgement’,Psychological Review 90, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C.: 1966, ‘Reasoning’, in B. Foss (ed.),New Horizons in Psychology, Penguin, Middlesex, pp. 135–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C.: 1968, ‘Reasoning about a Rule’,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20, 273–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C., and P. N. Johnson-Laird: 1972,Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K., and P. Culicover: 1980,Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stein, E. Rationality and reflective equilibrium. Synthese 99, 137–172 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064426

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064426

Keywords

Navigation