Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminating between preference functionals: A preliminary Monte Carlo study

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is connected with recent attempts to estimate EU and Generalised EU preference functionals using (complete ranking) experimental data and maximum likelihood estimation techniques. In particular we explore, using Monte Carlo techniques, the power of such procedures in correctly determining the true preference functional. We conclude that several of the more popular generalisations to EU are very difficult to disentangle, and that the techniques are rather poor at correctly identifying EU when it is the correct functional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya T. (1980). “Selection of Regressors,”International Economic Review 21, 3331–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone E., and J. D. Hey.“Estimation of Expected Utility and Non-Expected Utility Preference Functionals Using Complete Ranking Data.” In Munier B. and Machina M.J. (eds.),Models and Experiments on Risk and Rationality. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Chew C. S. (1983). “A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox,”Econometrica 51, 1065–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew C. S., E. Kami, and Z. Safra. (1987). “Empirical Tests of Weighted Utility Theory,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 30, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul F. (1991). “A Theory of Disappointment Aversion,”Econometrica 59, 667–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey J. D., and C. D. Orme. (1994). “Investigating Generalisations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data.”Econometrica, forthcoming.

  • Machina M. J. (1985). “Stochastic Choice Functions Generated from Deterministic Preferences over Lotteries,”Economic Journal 95, 575–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin J. (1982). “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., and D. Kahneman. (1992). “Advances on Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi W. K. (1989). “Prospective Reference Theory: Towards an Explanation of the Paradoxes,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2, 235–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari M. E. (1987). “The Dual Theory of Choice Under Risk,”Econometrica 55, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carbone, E., Hey, J.D. Discriminating between preference functionals: A preliminary Monte Carlo study. J Risk Uncertainty 8, 223–242 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064043

Key words

Navigation