References
Churchland, P. M. and P. S. Churchland: 1983, ‘Stalking the Wild Epistemic Engine’,Nous 17, 5–18.
Davidson, D.: 1977, ‘Reality Without Reference’,Dialectica 31, 247–58.
Davidson, D.: 1986, ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’, in E. LePore (ed.),Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 307–19.
Davies, M.: 1991, ‘Concepts, Connectionism and the Language of Thought’, in W. Ramsey et al. (eds.),Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229–57.
Dretske, F.: 1981,Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Field, H.: 1972, ‘Tarski's Theory of Truth’,The Journal of Philosophy 69, 347–75.
Field, H.: 1978, ‘Mental Representation’,Erkenntnis 13, 9–61.
Field, H.: 1986, ‘Stalnaker on Intentionality’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67, 98–112.
Fodor, J.: 1984, ‘Semantics, Wisconsin Style’,Synthese 59, 231–50.
Fodor, J.: 1987,Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Fodor, J.: 1990,A Theory of Content and Other Essays, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Fodor, J. and E. Lepore: 1992,Holism: A shopper's guide, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass.
Frege, G.: 1893,The Basic Laws of Arithmetic (M. Furth, trans.), University of California Press, Berkeley (1964).
Geach, P.: 1956,Mental Acts: Their Content and Their Objects, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Kripke, S.: 1972,Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Loar, B.: 1987, ‘Subjective Intentionality’,Philosophical Topics 15, 89–124.
McDowell, J.: 1978, ‘Physicalism and Primitive Denotation: Field on Tarski’,Erkenntnis 13, 131–52.
Russell, B.: 1912,The Problems of Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1959).
Schiffer, S.: 1986, ‘Stalnaker's Problem of Intentionality’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67, 87–97.
Soames, S.: 1984, ‘What is a Theory of Truth?’,The Journal of Philosophy 81, 411–29.
Stalnaker, R.: 1984,Inquiry, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Stampe, D.: 1975, ‘Show and Tell’ in B. Freed et al. (eds.),Forms of Representation: proceedings of the 1972 Colloquium of the University of Western Ontario, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 221–45.
Stampe, D.: 1977, ‘Towards a Causal Theory of Linguistic Representation’ in P. Frenchet al. (eds.),Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1979), pp. 81–102.
Stampe, D.: 1986, ‘Verificationism and a Causal Account of Meaning’,Synthese 69, 107–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Work on this paper began while I was at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and was supported in part by a Charles Phelps Taft Postdoctoral Fellowship at the University of Cincinnati. Versions were read at East Carolina University and the University of San Diego. For comments and discussion I am very grateful to Chris Gauker, Jagdish Hattiangadi, Russell Trenholme, Elliott Sober, Michael Byrd, Ernest LePore, and Dennis Stampe. I am also very grateful to an anonymous referee for this journal who provided welcome comments which led to improvements.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hogan, M. What is wrong with an atomistic account of mental representation?. Synthese 100, 307–327 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063813
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063813