Skip to main content
Log in

What is wrong with an atomistic account of mental representation?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Churchland, P. M. and P. S. Churchland: 1983, ‘Stalking the Wild Epistemic Engine’,Nous 17, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1977, ‘Reality Without Reference’,Dialectica 31, 247–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1986, ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’, in E. LePore (ed.),Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 307–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.: 1991, ‘Concepts, Connectionism and the Language of Thought’, in W. Ramsey et al. (eds.),Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1981,Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1972, ‘Tarski's Theory of Truth’,The Journal of Philosophy 69, 347–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1978, ‘Mental Representation’,Erkenntnis 13, 9–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1986, ‘Stalnaker on Intentionality’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67, 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1984, ‘Semantics, Wisconsin Style’,Synthese 59, 231–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1987,Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1990,A Theory of Content and Other Essays, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. and E. Lepore: 1992,Holism: A shopper's guide, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1893,The Basic Laws of Arithmetic (M. Furth, trans.), University of California Press, Berkeley (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1956,Mental Acts: Their Content and Their Objects, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1972,Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loar, B.: 1987, ‘Subjective Intentionality’,Philosophical Topics 15, 89–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1978, ‘Physicalism and Primitive Denotation: Field on Tarski’,Erkenntnis 13, 131–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1912,The Problems of Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, S.: 1986, ‘Stalnaker's Problem of Intentionality’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S.: 1984, ‘What is a Theory of Truth?’,The Journal of Philosophy 81, 411–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1984,Inquiry, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampe, D.: 1975, ‘Show and Tell’ in B. Freed et al. (eds.),Forms of Representation: proceedings of the 1972 Colloquium of the University of Western Ontario, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 221–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampe, D.: 1977, ‘Towards a Causal Theory of Linguistic Representation’ in P. Frenchet al. (eds.),Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1979), pp. 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampe, D.: 1986, ‘Verificationism and a Causal Account of Meaning’,Synthese 69, 107–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work on this paper began while I was at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and was supported in part by a Charles Phelps Taft Postdoctoral Fellowship at the University of Cincinnati. Versions were read at East Carolina University and the University of San Diego. For comments and discussion I am very grateful to Chris Gauker, Jagdish Hattiangadi, Russell Trenholme, Elliott Sober, Michael Byrd, Ernest LePore, and Dennis Stampe. I am also very grateful to an anonymous referee for this journal who provided welcome comments which led to improvements.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogan, M. What is wrong with an atomistic account of mental representation?. Synthese 100, 307–327 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063813

Keywords

Navigation