Abstract
The diel feeding behavior of four coexisting odonate larvae, Aeshna juncea, Coenagrion hastulatum, Cordulia aenea,and Leucorrhinia dubiawas studied in the laboratory. C. hastulatumand L. dubiawere equally active during day and night. While C. hastulatumconsumed an equal number of prey during day and night, L. dubiaconsumed more prey during night. In contrast, A. juncealarvae were most active and consumed more prey during day, while C. aenealarvae were most active and consumed more prey during night. In contrast to the other three species, A. junceashowed a longer reactive distance under light conditions. In A. junceaand L. dubiacapture efficiency was higher under light conditions, whereas in C. hastulatumand C. aeneait was the same irrespective of illumination. The results show that the time niche is an important component of the feeding in this guild.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ando, H. (1957). A comparative study on the development of ommatidia in Odonata.Sci. Rep. Tokyo Kyoiku Daig. (B) 8: 174–216.
Blois-Heulin, C., and Cloarec, A. (1988). Diel variations of food intake inAnax Imperator andAeshna cyanea larvae.Biol. Behav. 13: 116–124.
D'aguilar, J., Dommanget, J.-L., and Prechac, R. (1986).A guide to the Dragonflies of Britain, Europe and North Africa (translated by Brooks, S., Brooks, N., and Robertsson, T. S.), Collins, London.
Henrikson, B.-I. (1988). The absence of antipredator behaviour in the larvae ofLeucorrhinia dubia (Odonata) and its consequences for the distribution.Oikos 51: 179–183.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure.Scand. J. Stat. 6: 65–70.
Johansson, F. (1991). Foraging modes in an assemblage of odonate larvae—effects of prey and interference.Hydrobiologia 209: 79–87.
Johnson, J. H. (1985). Diel feeding ecology of the nymphs ofAeshna multicolor andLestes unguiculatus (Odonata).Freshw. Biol. 15: 749–755.
McPeek, M. A. (1990a). Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes.Ecology 71: 83–98.
McPeek, M. A. (1990b). Behavioral differences betweenEnallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators.Ecology 71: 1714–1726.
Nilsson, B.-I. (1981). Susceptibility of some Odonata larvae to fish predation.Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 21: 1612–1615.
Pritchard, G. (1965). Prey capture by dragonfly larvae (Odonata; Anisoptera).Can. J. Zool. 43: 271–289.
Richard, G. (1960). Les bases sensorielles du comportement de capture des proies par diverses larvea d'Odonates.J. Psychol. Normale Pathol. 57: 95–107.
Richard, G. (1970). New aspects of the regulation of predatory behaviour of Odonata nymphs. In Aronsonet al. (eds.),Development and Evolution of Behaviour, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 435–451.
Sherk, T. E. (1977). Development of the compound eyes of dragonflies (Odonata). I. Larval compound eyes.J. Exp. Zool. 201: 391–416.
Thompson, D. M., and Pickup, J. (1984). Feeding rates of zygoptera larvae within an instar.Odonatologica 13: 309–315.
Wallace, J. B., Cuffney, T. F., Lay, C. C., and Vogel, D. (1987). The influence of an ecosystemlevel manipulation on prey consumption by a lotic dragonfly.Can. J. Zool. 65: 35–40.
Wilkinson, L. (1988).SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, Systat, Evanston, IL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, F. Diel feeding behavior in larvae of four odonate species. J Insect Behav 6, 253–264 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01051508
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01051508