Skip to main content
Log in

Two remarks on the effect of increased equalitarianism in decisional skills on the number of individuals that maximizes group judgmental competence

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employing the symmetric uncertain dichotomous choice model, this paper is concerned with the effect of two types of changes in individual decisional competencies on the optimal collective decision rule and, in particular, on the optimal number of essential decision makers (individuals who are effectively involved in the decision-making process). The first change is simply a decrease in the decisional skills of some of the existing more competent essential decision makers. The second change is a rank and mean-preserving equalization of decisional skills. We show that the number of essential decision makers is not necessarily positively related to both of these changes. This surprising observation implies that a more egalitarian distribution of decisional skills may justify a reduction in the optimal number of individuals effectively participating in the collective decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Feld, S. and Grofman, B. (1984). The accuracy of group majority decisions in groups with added numbers.Public Choice 42: 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M. (1986). Necessary and sufficient conditions for the optimally of the simple majority and restricted simple majority decision rules.Theory and Decision, 21: 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M. and Nitzan, S. (1986). Performance evaluation of some special classes of weighted majority rules.Mathematical Social Sciences 12: 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karotkin, D., Nitzan, S. and Paroush, J. (1988). The essential ranking of decision rules in small panels of experts.Theory and Decision 24: 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karotkin, D. and Paroush, J. (1994). Variability of decisional ability and the essential order of decision rules.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Forthcoming.

  • Nitzan, S. and Paroush, J. (1982). Optimal decision rules in uncertain dichotomous choice situations.International Economic Review 23: 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. and Grofman, B. (1987). A theorem on the optimal allocation of effort.Revista Colombiana de Mathematicas 21: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paroush, J. and Karotkin, D. (1989). Robustness of optimal majority rules over teams with changing size.Social Choice and Welfare 6: 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. and Grofman, B. (1984). Optimizing group judgmental accuracy in the presence of interdependencies.Public Choice 43: 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karotkin, D., Nitzan, S. Two remarks on the effect of increased equalitarianism in decisional skills on the number of individuals that maximizes group judgmental competence. Public Choice 85, 307–311 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048201

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048201

Keywords

Navigation