Procedural bias in forensic science examinations of human hair
- Larry S. Miller
- … show all 1 hide
Several forms of expert forensic science evaluations exist that rely at least in part on the subjective opinion of the examiner. Human hair identification is one such examination. This paper considers possible sources of influence or bias that may be responsible for examiner errors. Data are reported of an experiment that compares the conventional examination procedure (known versus questioned samples) against an alternative procedure (a lineup of samples) designed to limit the influence of factors that contribute to error. The altenative procedure produced fewer incorrect conclusions (3.8%) than the conventional procedure (30.4%).
- Bisbing, R. E. (1982). The forensic identification and association of human hair. In R. Saferstein (Ed.),Forensic science handbook. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Brent v. White (1967). 276 F. Supp. 386 (E.D. La.).
- Brigham, J. C. (1983). Psychological factors in eyewitness identifications.Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 47–56.
- Camps, F. E. (1976).Gradwohl's legal medicine (3rd ed.). Chicago: John Wright and Sons.
- Cantor, N. (1981). Perceptions of situations: Situation prototypes and person—situation prototypes. In D. Magnusson (Ed.),Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Clifford, B. R., & Scott, J. (1978). Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 352–359.
- Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness testimony.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 365–370.
- Curran, W. J., & Shapiro, E. D. (1982).Law, medicine, and forensic science (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
- Evans, S. S., & Scott, J. E. (1983). Social scientists as expert witnesses: Their use, misuse, and sometimes abuse.Law and Policy Quarterly, 5, 181–214.
- Foster v. California (1969). 394 U.S. 440, 22 L. Ed. 2d 402, 89 S. Ct. 1127.
- Gaudette, B. D. (1974). An attempt at determing probabilities in human scalp hair comparison.Journal of Forensic Sciences, 19, 599.
- Gaudette, B. D. (1976). Probabilities and human pubic hair comparisons.Journal of Forensic Sciences, 21, 514.
- Gilbert v. California (1967). 388 U.S. 263, 87 S. Ct. 1951, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1178.
- Jones, R. A. (1977).Self-fulfilling prophecies: Social psychological and physiological effects of expectations. Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Kirby v. Illinois (1972). 406 U.S. 682, 32 L. Ed. 2d 411, 92 S. Ct. 1877.
- Loftus, E. F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- McFarland v. U. S. (1945). 150 F. 2d 593 (D. C. Cir.).
- Miller, L. S., Bass, W. M., & Miller, R. L. (1985).Human evidence in criminal justice (2d ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.
- Moenssens, A. A., Inbau, F. E., & Starrs, J. E. (1986).Scientific evidence in criminal cases (3rd ed.). Mineola, New York: The Foundation Press.
- Nesbitt, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
- Ogle, R. R., & Barnett, P. D. (1980). Probability and hair comparison. InAbstracts of the 55th semiannual seminar. Colorado Springs: American Academy of Forensic Sciences.
- Parisi, N. (1985).Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, 1984. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
- Reed, T. (1984). Eyewitness identifications of an armed robber within a biased police lineup.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 310–315.
- Rosenthal, R. (1974).On the social psychology of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Further evidence for pygmalian effects and their mediating mechanism. New York: M.S.S. Modular Publications.
- Sensabaugh, G. F. (1982). Biochemical markers of individuality. In R. Saferstein (Ed.),Forensic science handbook. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Snyder, M. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.
- Snyder, M., & Swann, W. (1978). Behavioral conformation in social interaction: From social perceptions to social reality.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 148–162.
- U. S. v. Mara (1973). 410 U.S. 19.
- U. S. v. Wade (1967). 388 U.S. 218, 87 S. Ct. 1926, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1199.
- Williams, T., & Hammelmann, S. (1963). Indentification parades, part. 1.Criminal Law Review, 62, 479–483.
- Yarmey, A. D. (1979).The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: Free Press.
- Procedural bias in forensic science examinations of human hair
Law and Human Behavior
Volume 11, Issue 2 , pp 157-163
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Larry S. Miller (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Criminal Justice, East Tennessee State University, Tennessee, USA