Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological implications of condensed tannin structure: A case study

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Condensed tannins were isolated from bitterbnish (Purshia tridentata) and blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima). Structural analyses showed that both tannins were procyanidins of similar polymer length. The overall stereochemistries at C-3 and C-4, however, differed between the two tannins. These changes in stereochemistry resulted in blackbrush tannins being less preferred than bitterbrush tannins when offered to snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus). It is unlikely that differences in protein-precipitating abilities are the cause for the preference of the bitterbrush over the blackbrush tannins. Instead, we hypothesize that condensed tannins may be depolymerized and absorbed following ingestion. Differences in tannin structure can lead to different depolymerized products and rates of depolymerization, both of which may affect herbivore preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asquith, T.N., andButler, L.G. 1985. Use of dye-labeled proteins as spectrophotometric assay for protein precipitates such as tannins.J. Chem. Ecol. 11:1535–1544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asquith, T.N., andButler, L.G. 1986. Interactions of condensed tannins with selected proteins.Phytochemistry 25:1591–1593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blytt, H.J., Gusar, T.K., andButler, L.G. 1988. Antinutritional effects and ecological significance of dietary condensed tannins may not be due to binding and inhibition of digestive enzymes.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1455–1466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L.G., Rogler, J.C., Mehansho, H., andCarlson, D.M. 1986. Dietary effects of tannins, p. 141–157,in V. Cody, E. Middleton, Jr., and J.B. Harborne (eds.). Plant Flavonoids in Biology and Medicine: Biochemical, Pharmacological and Structure-activity Relationships. Alan R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czochanska, Z.,Foo, L.Y.,Newman, R.H., andPorter, L.J. 1980. Polymeric proanthocyanidins. Stereochemistry, structural units, and molecular weight.J. Chem. Soc. Perkin I. 2278–2286.

  • Ellis, C.J., Foo, L.Y., andPorter, L.J. 1983. Enantiomerism: A characteristic of the proanthocyanidin chemistry of the monocotyledonae.Phytochemistry 22:483–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P.R. 1969. Inhibitory effect of oak leaf tannins on the hydrolysis of proteins by trypsin.Phytochemistry 8:2119–2126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P.R. 1976. Plant apparency and chemical defense, pp. 1–40,in J.W. Wallace and R.L. Mansell (eds.). Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Vol. 10, Biochemical Interaction between Plants and Insects. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, A.C., Porter, L.J., Haslam, E., andGupta, R.K. 1977. Plant proanthocyanidins. Part 3. Conformational and configurational studies of natural procyanidins.J. Chem. Soc. Perkin I. 1628–1637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, A.E. 1987. Radial diffusion method for determining tannin in plant extracts.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:437–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, A.E., andButler, L.G. 1980. Condensed tannin purification and characterization of tannin associated proteins.J. Agric. Food. Chem. 28:947–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, A.E., andButler, L.G. 1981. The specificity of proanthocyanidin-protein interactions.J. Biol. Chem. 256:4494–4497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, A.E., andKlucher, K.M. 1986. Plant Flavanoids in Biology and Medicine: biochemical, Pharmacological and Structure-Activity relationships. Alan R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, A.E., andRobbins, C.T. 1987. Implications of soluble tannin-protein complexes for tannin analysis and plant defense mechanisms.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1243–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, R.W., andMcGraw, G.W. 1983. Kinetics of acid-catalyzed cleavage of procyanidins.J. Wood Chem. Technol. 3:421–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, R.W., Foo, L.Y., andPorter, L.J. 1982. Linkage isomerism in trimeric and polymeric 2,3-cis-procyanidins.J. Chem. Soc. Perkin 1. 1209–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, R.W., McGraw, G.W., Karchesy, J.J., Foo, L.Y., andPorter, L.J. 1983. Recent advances in the chemistry of condensed tannins.J. Appl. Polym. Scl. Appl. Polym. Symp. 37:967–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, F., Nonaka, G., andNishioka. 1985. Acetylated flavanols and proanthocyanidins fromSalix sieboldiana.Phytochemistry 24:2089–2092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, D., andHaslam, E. 1974. Plant proanthocyanidins. Part II. Proanthocyanidin-A2 and its derivatives.J. Chem. Soc. Perkin I. 2663–2671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W.T., Broadhurst, B., andLyttleton, J.W. 1976. The condensed tannins of pasture legume species.Phytochemistry 15:1407–1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karchesy, J.J., andHemingway, R.W. 1980. Loblolly pine bark polyflavanoids.J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:222–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kufeld, R.C. 1973. Foods eaten by the rocky mountain elk.J. Range Manage. 26:106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kufeld, R.C., Wallmo, O.C., andFeddema, C. 1973. Foods of the rocky mountain mule deer. USDA Forest Service Resarch Report RM-111, Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth, R.L., andBatzli, G.O. 1984. Plant phenolics as chemical defenses: effects of natural phenolics on survival and growth of prairie voles.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, J.P., Davis, K.G., Lilley, T.H., andHaslam, E. 1981. The association of proteins with polyphenols.J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 7:309–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehansho, H., Butler, L.G., andCarlson, D.M. 1987. Dietary tannins and salivary prolinerich proteins: Interactions, induction and defense mechanisms.Annu. Rev. Nutr. 7:423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mole, S., andWaterman., D.G. 1987. A critical analyses of techniques for measuring tannins in ecological studies. I. Techniques for chemically defining tannins.Oecologia 72:137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Harvey, I., Reed, J.D., andHartley, R.D. 1987. Characterization of phenolic compounds, including flavanoids and tannins, of ten Ethiopian browse species of HPLC.J. Sci. Food Agric. 39:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, G.,Hsu, F., andNishioka, I. 1981. Structures of dimeric, trimeric, and tetrameric procyanidins fromAreca catechu L.J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 781–783.

  • Porter, L.I. 1986. Number- and weight-average molecular weights for some proanthocyanidin polymers (condensed tannins).Aust. J. Chem. 39:557–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L.J., andWoodruffe, I. 1984. Haemanalysis: The relative astringency of proanthocyanidin polymers.Phytochemistry 23:1255–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L.J., Newman, R.H., Foo, L.Y., andWong, H. 1982. Polymeric proanthocyanidins. [13C]NMR Studies of procyanidins.J. Chem. Soc. Perkin I. 1217–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L.J., Foo, L.Y., andFurneaux, R.H. 1985. Isolation of three naturally occurringO-β-glucopyranosides of procyanidin polymers.Phytochemistry 24:567–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provenza, F.D., andMalechek, J.C. 1984. Diet selection by domestic goats in relation to blackbrush twig chemistry.J. Appl. Ecol. 21:831–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provenza, F.D.,Burritt, E.A.,Clausen, T.P.,Bryant, J.P.,Reichardt, P.B., andDistel, R.A. 1989. Conditioned taste aversions: A mechanism for goats to avoid condensed tannins in blackbrush.Am. Nat. In press.

  • Rhoades, D.F., andCates, R.G. 1976. Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry, p. 168–213,in J.W. Wallace and R.L. Mansell (eds.). Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Vol. 10, Biochemical Interaction between Plants and Insects. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, C.T., Hanley, T.A., Hagerman, A.E., Hjeljord, O., Baker, D.L., Schwartz, C.C., andMoutz, W.W. 1987. Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: Reduction in protein availability.Ecology 68:98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, D.G., Ferreira, D., andBotha, J.J. 1980. Structural considerations in predicting the utilization of tannins.J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:216–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Z., Haslam, E., Falshaw, C.P., andBegley, M.J. 1986. Procyanidins and polyphenols ofLarix gmelini bark.Phytochemistry 25:2629–2635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheperd, H.R. 1971. Effects of clipping on key browse species in southwestern Colorado. Colorado Division of Game, Fish and Parks, Tech. Pub. 28, Denver, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, T. 1979. Tannins and lignins, p. 657–682,in G.A. Rosenthal and D.H. Janzen (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interaction with Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takechi, M., Tanaka, Y., Takehara, M., Nonaka, G., andNishioka, I. 1985. Structure and antiherpetic activity among the tannins.Phytochemistry 24:2245–2250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sumere, C.F., Albrecht, J., Dedonder, A., Depooter, H., andPé, I. 1975. Plant proteins and phenolics, p. 211–264,in J.B. Harborne and C.F. Van Sumere (eds.). The Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Proteins, Vol. 11. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, V.M., Porter, L.J., andHemingway, R.W. 1983. Molecular weight profiles of proanthocyanidin polymers.Phytochemistry 22:569–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, W.V. 1983. Tannins: Does structure determine function? An ecological perspective.Am. Nat. 121:335–365.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clausen, T.P., Provenza, F.D., Burritt, E.A. et al. Ecological implications of condensed tannin structure: A case study. J Chem Ecol 16, 2381–2392 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017463

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017463

Key words

Navigation