, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 19-40

Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

How people think about poverty is shown to be dependent on how the issue is framed. When news media presentations frame poverty as a general outcome, responsibility for poverty is assigned to society-at-large; when news presentations frame poverty as a particular instance of a poor person, responsibility is assigned to the individual. Similar framing effects are documented in the 1986 General Social Survey where the amount of public assistance deemed appropriate for a poor family varies with the description of the family. In concluding, the implications of framing for the study of public opinion are considered.