Skip to main content
Log in

Seizing the means of reproduction: An illegal feminist abortion collective—How and why it worked

  • Articles
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an illegal feminist abortion collective [the Service] through whose efforts 11,000 abortions were performed between 1969 and 1973 when abortion was legalized. An analysis of interviews from 32 members of this lay group indicates how and why the collective was so effective in providing what is usually a physician-controlled medical procedure. After describing the structure of the organization and the process by which women obtained the abortion, including pre-abortion counseling and post-abortion follow-up, two sets of reasons for the collective's effectiveness are presented. The first five reasons derive from the interview themselves; they deal with the organization's social and historical context, its illegality, its charismatic leaders, its member satisfaction and its financial self-sufficiency. The next nine reasons deal with factors that make The Service a relatively typical democratic collective organization. The most important of these factors is its lack of concern for organizational survival per se. This account supports the Rothschild-Whitt model for collective democratic organizations. It also suggests that counseling is important both for the providers and for the receivers of abortions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • The Abortion Counseling Service Date Not Given.Abortion — a woman's decision, a woman's right pamphlet. Chicago: Women's Liberation Movement.

  • Bart, Pauline B., & Melinda Bart Schlesinger 1982 Collective work and self identity. In Frank Lindenfeld and Joyce Rothschild-Whitt,Workplace Democracy and Social Change. Boston: Porter Sargent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, Barbara & Deidre English 1973Complaints and disorders: The sexual politics of sickness. Old Westbury: The Feminist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, Ken, Richard Price, Shulamit Reinharz, Stephanie Riger, & Abraham Wandersman 1984Psychology and community change. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Mary (pseud. Margaret Campbell) 1973Why would a girl go into medicine. Old Westbury: The Feminist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, Carole 1978 What abortion counselors want from their clients.Social Problems 26:112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenfeld, Frank, & Joyce Rothschild-Whitt 1982Workplace, Democracy and Social Change. Boston: Porter Sargent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl 1985The German ideology. New York: The International Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Robert 1949Political parties. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Karen 1976 Creating divisions of labor: a case study of nonprofessionals professing self-help. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.

  • Roth, J. A. 1974 Care of the sick: Professionalism vs. love.Social science and medicine 1173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce 1979 Conditions facilitating participatory-democratic organizations.Sociological Inquiry 46(2):75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce 1979 Collective democracy: An alternative to rational bureaucratic models of organization.American Sociological Review 44:519–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, George 1950 The secret and the secret society. Pp. 307–16 inThe Sociology of George Simmel. Trans. edited and with an introduction by Kurt H. Wolff. Glencoe: The Free Press, 307–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll 1975 The female world of love and ritual: relations between women in nineteenth-century America.Signs 1:1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Rosemary 1976 Alternative medicine: Politics and organization in the free clinic movement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara.

  • Tietze, Christopher 1979Induced abortion: 1970, 3rd edition. New York: Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max 1968Economy and society. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittrich (eds.). New York: Bedminister Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, Mayer N., & Roberta Ash 1964 Social movement organizations: Growth decay and change.Social Forces 44:327–341.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bart, P.B. Seizing the means of reproduction: An illegal feminist abortion collective—How and why it worked. Qual Sociol 10, 339–357 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988383

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988383

Keywords

Navigation