Skip to main content
Log in

Nonfloral sources of chemicals that attract male euglossine bees (Apidae: Euglossini)

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present chemical analysis of four rotten or fungus-infected logs that attracted fragrance-collecting male euglossine bees. Eight of the 10 volatile compounds detected have never been found in the fragrances of orchids pollinated by male euglossine bees. Nonfloral sources of chemicals such as rotting wood may constitute an important fragrance resource for male bees. Since rotten logs produce large quantities of chemicals over long periods of time, such nonfloral sources might be more important than flowers as a source of certain fragrances for some euglossine bee species. Fragrance collecting in euglossine bees might have evolved originally in relation with rotting wood rather than flowers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, J.D. 1983. Specificity and mutual dependency of the orchid-euglossine bee interaction.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 20:301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, J.D. 1985. Euglossine bees and their nectar hosts, pp. 225–233,in W.G. D'Arcy and M.D. Correa (eds.). The Botany and Natural History of Panama. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri.

  • Ackerman, J.D. 1989. Geographic and seasonal variation in fragrance choices and preferences of male euglossine bees.Biotropica 21:340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausloos, P., Clifton, C., Lias, S.G., Shamim, A., Stein, S.E. 1992. NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Database, PC Version 4.0. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, C.H. 1975. Coevolution of orchids and bees, pp. 91–99,in L.E. Gilbert and P.H. Raven (eds.). Coevolution of Animals and Plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, R.L. 1967. Why do euglossine bees visit orchid flowers?Atas Simpo. Sobre Biota Amazon. 5:171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, R.L. 1982. Biology of the orchid bees (Euglossini).Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13:373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, G., andSchill, R. 1989. Fragrance analyses, an aid to taxonomic relationships of the genusCoryanthes (Orchidaceae).Plant Syst. Evol. 168:159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, G., andSchill, R. 1991. Composition of orchid scents attracting euglossine bees.Bot. Acta 104:379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H. 1971. Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants.Science 171:203–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H., De Vries, P.J., Higgins, M.L., andKimsey, L.S. 1981. Seasonal and site variation in Costa Rican euglossine bees at chemical baits in a deciduous forest and an evergreen forest.Ecology 63:66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, R. 1993. The Scent of Orchids: Olfactory and Chemical Investigations. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 259 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiester, A.R., Lande, R., andSchemske, D.W. 1984. Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators.Am. Nat. 124:220–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimsey, L.S. 1980. The behaviour of male orchid bees (Apidae, Hymenoptera, Insecta) and the question of leks.Anim. Behav. 28:996–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimsey, L.S. 1982. Abstract. International Union for the Study of Social Insects Meetings at Boulder, Colorado.

  • Kimsey, L.S. 1984. The behavioral and structural aspects of grooming and related activities in euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).J. Zool. 204:541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunau, K. 1992. Evolutionary aspects of perfume collection in male euglossine bees (Hymenoptera) and of nest deception in bee-pollinated flowers.Chemoecology 3:65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D.R., Alecrim, W.D., Heller, J.M., Ehrhardt, S.R., andLima, J.B. 1982. MaleEufriesia purpurata, a DDT-collecting bee in Brazil.Nature 297:62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D.W. 1989. Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 514 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D.W., andAckerman, J.D. 1987. Long-term ecology of euglossine orchid-bees (Apidae: Euglossini) in Panama.Oecologia 73:321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D.W., andLande, R. 1984. Fragrance collection and territorial display by male orchid bees.Anim. Behav. 32:935–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.N., andMeeuse, B.J.D. 1966. Production of volatile amines and skatole at anthesis in someArum lily species.Plant Physiol. 41:343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D.L. 1991. Male territoriality and alternative male behaviors in the euglossine beeEulaema meriana (Hymenoptera: Apidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 64:421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabacchi, R., andNicollier, G. 1979. Contribution to the knowledge of the chemical composition of oak moss (Evernia prunastri Ach.).Int. Congr. Essent. Oils 7:394–387. Japan Flavor Fragrance Manuf. Assoc. Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, W.M., Young, A.M., andWilliams, N.H. 1989. Function of glandular secretions in fragrance collection by male euglossine bees (Apidae: Euglossini).J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1285–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N.H. 1982. The biology of orchids and euglossine bees. pp. 119–171in J. Arditti (ed.). Orchid Biology: Reviews and Perspectives, II. Cornell Univ. Press. Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N.H., andWhitten, W.M. 1983. Orchid floral fragrances and male euglossine bees: Methods and advances in the last sesquidecade.Biol. Bull. 164:355–395.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitten, W.M., Young, A.M. & Stern, D.L. Nonfloral sources of chemicals that attract male euglossine bees (Apidae: Euglossini). J Chem Ecol 19, 3017–3027 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980599

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980599

Key Words

Navigation