Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New paradigms in teacher evaluation: The SBESD model

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandura, A. (1971)Social learning theory. New York: General Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, A. (1984). The principal as practical inquirer: Looking for workable answers.NASSP Bulletin, 68(476), 4–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. (1987). On teacher evaluation: A conversation with Tom McGreal.Educational Leadership, 44(7), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, E.M. (1985). It's time to get tough with the turkeys.Principal, 64(3), 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogan, M.L. (1973).Clinical supervision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, S.M. (1953).Action research to improve school practices. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D.L. & Stiggins, R. (1985).Teacher evaluation: Five keys to growth. Washington, D.C.: NEA Professional Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulany, D.E. (1968). Awareness, rules, and propositional control: A confrontation with S-R Behavior theory. In T.R. Dixon & D.L. Horton (eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavioral theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaker, R.E. (1972). An analysis of the clinical supervision process as perceived by selected teachers and administrators. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee.

  • Fullan, M.G. & Hargreaves, A. (1991).What's worth fighting for? Working together for your school. Toronto: Ontario Public Teachers' Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M.G. & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991).The new meaning of educational change with S. Steigelbauer: New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garman, N.B. (1971). A study of clinical supervision as a resource of college teachers of English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Garmston, R.J. (1987). How administrators support peer coaching.Educational Leadership, 44(5), 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatthorn, A.A. (1984).Differentiated supervision Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, C.D. (1981).Developmental supervision: Alternative practices for helping teachers improve instruction. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhammer, R. (1969).Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (1984).A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991). Why we need a complete redesign of teacher education.Educational Leadership, 49(3) 4–6, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, L., Wise, A.E., & Pease, S.R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature.Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional: Contrived collegiality, collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching.Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(3), 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, H.L. (1957). Action research: A critique.Journal of Educational Sociology, 31(4), 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M.A. (1983). Improvement strategies that work: Some scenarios.Educational Leadership, 4(3), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., & Taylor, M.S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, (64), 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1980). The uncertainties of teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.

  • Johnson, A.W. (1991). A case study of a midwestern high school using Joyce's model to implement a complex school school improvement innovation: Authentic assessment Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University.

  • Joyce, B. & Showers, B. (1987). Low cost arrangements for peer coaching.Journal of Staff Development, 8(1), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B. School renewal as culture change.Educational Leadership. 47(3), 70–77.

  • Kauchak, D. (1985). An interview study of teacher's attitudes toward evaluation practices.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19(1), 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B.J. (1976). An investigation of the process of using feedback data within the clinical supervision cycle to facilitate teachers individualization of instruction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Krajewski, R.J. (1976). Clinical supervision to facilitate self-improvement.Journal of Research and Development in Education, (9), 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.W. (1981). The power of organizational setting (paper adapted from final report, School success and staff development) Washington D.C.: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D.C. (1975)Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Harding, C.K., Arbuckle, M.A., Murray, L.B., Dubea, C., & Williams, M.K. (1987).Continuing to Learn: A guidebook for teacher development. Andover, Mass: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manatt, R.P. (1989). Principal evaluation is largely wrong-headed and ineffective.Executive Educator, 11(11), 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, R.L. (1974). Knowledge from practice: Clinical research and development in education.Counseling Psychologist, 4(4), 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reavis, C.A. (1977). A test of the clinical supervision model.Journal of Educational Research, 70(6), 311–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S.J. (1990). Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers' commitment.Sociology of Education, 63(4), 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1985).Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, J.L. (1976). Teacher perceptions of ideal and actual supervisory training programs sponsored by the association of California School Administrators. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.

  • Shulman, L.S. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of educational reform.Educational Leadership, 46(3), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuma, K.Y. (1973). Changes effectuated by a clinical supervisory relationship which emphasize a helping relationship and a conference format made congruent with the establishment and maintenance of this helping relationship. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Smulyan, L. (1983). Action research on change in schools: A collaborative project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

  • Sweeney, J. & Manatt, R.P. (1984). A team approach to supervising the marginal teacher.Educational Leadership, 41(7), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikunoff, W.J., Ward, B.A. & Griffin, G.A. (1979).Interactive research and development on teaching study: Final report. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, W. (1992).Principals and practices for effective teacher evaluation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1982).The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Administration, Iowa State University, N229 Lagomarcino Hall, 50011, Ames, IA

    Jim Sweeney

Authors
  1. Jim Sweeney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sweeney, J. New paradigms in teacher evaluation: The SBESD model. J Pers Eval Educ 8, 223–237 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973722

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973722

Keywords

Search

Navigation