Conclusion
In this paper I have tried to give the SAS some descriptive content with respect to English. I have suggested that correlations of form, function and fit play a central role in accounting for understanding literal and direct communication, and I have tried to take some initial steps towards constructing a plausible theory of such communication incorporating these notions.
As with any developing theory, the SAS has a long way to grow. Among the problem areas that need further work are the following: (1) The nature of the semantic representation in line L2; (2) An account of the notion ‘knowledge of language’ appealed to in line L1(a); (3) Psychological evidence for the various levels of processing and mediating procedures; (4) An account of the nature of pragmatic rules and their relationsip to grammars. Fortunately, these are matters for other times and other places.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akmajian, A., R. Demers, R. Harnish: 1980, ‘Overcoming Inadequacies in the Message Model of Linguistic Communication’, inCommunication and Cognition 13: 317–336.
Akmajian, A., S. Steele, and T. Wasow: 1979, ‘The Category AUX in Universal Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 10: 1–64.
Belnap, N. and T. Steele: 1976,The Logic of Questions and Answers, Yale University Press.
Bing, J.: 1980,Aspects of English Prosody, Indiana Linguistics Club.
Chomsky, N. and H. Lasnik: 1977, ‘Filters and Control’,Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.
Culicover, P.: 1972, ‘OM sentences’,Foundations of Language 8: 199–236.
Culicover, P. and R. Harnish: in preparation,Form and Function.
Fodor, J.: 1981, ‘The Modularity of Mind,’ Xerox, MIT.
Harnish, R.: 1980, ‘Auxiliaries and Speech Acts’, paper presented at theFourth Groningen Roundtable: The Aux, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Harnish, R.: 1981,Four Lectures on Inferential Pragmatics, University of California, Irvine, School of Social Sciences.
Holdcroft, D.: 1978,Words and Deeds, Oxford University Press.
Jespersen, O.: 1924,The Philosophy of Grammar, Norton.
Katz, J.: 1977,Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force, T. Crowell.
Lewis, D.: 1970, ‘General Semantics’,Synthese 22: 18–67.
Liberman M.: 1978,The Intonational System of English, Indiana Linguistics Club.
Lyons, J.: 1968,Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J.: 1977,Semantics, Cambridge University Press.
Sadock, J.: 1974,Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts, Academic Press.
Schiffer, S.: 1972,Meaning, Oxford University Press.
Williams, E.: 1977, ‘Discourse and Logical Form’,Linguistic Inquiry 8: 101–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harnish, R.M. Pragmatic derivations. Synthese 54, 325–373 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877685
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877685