Skip to main content
Log in

Corporations, minors, and other innocents — A reply to R. E. Ewin

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

R. E. Ewin has argued that corporations are moral persons, but Ewin describes them as being unable to think or to act in virtuous and vicious ways. Ewin thinks that their impoverished emotional life would not allow them to act in these ways. In this brief essay I want to challenge the idea that corporations cannot act virtuously. I begin by examining deficiencies in Ewin's notion of corporate personhood. I argue that he effectively reduces corporations to the status of incompetent patients. I shall make use of a richer notion of corporate personhood as I explore the logical relationship between corporate action and the quality of the corporate emotional life. After discussing an alternate methodology for making moral assessments of action I consider briefly two corporate disasters: the crash on Mt. Erebus, the Imperial Foods plant fire. These cases are used to show the inadequacy of Ewin's thesis that only corporate managers are capable of displaying vice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Covenington, A.: 1991, Telephone interview with P. Eddy Wilson.

  • Ewin, R. E.: 1981,Cooperation and Human Values (St. Martin's, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewin, R. E.: 1991, ‘The Moral Status of the Corporation’,Journal of Business Ethics 10(7).

  • French, P. A.: 1984,Collective and Corporate Responsibility (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P. A.: 1979, ‘The Corporation as a Moral Person’,American Philosophical Quarterly 16(3).

  • Greensboro News and Record ‘They failed Utterly: Report Faults Many in Plant-fire Death’, Associated Press, December 4, p. B1.

  • Greensboro News and Record ‘Plant Fire Fuels Dialogue, Action’, by John Conway, September 13, p. 1.

  • Greensboro News and Record ‘Report: Exists Locked at Plant,’ by Taft Wireback, September 5, p. 1.

  • Griffith, A. P.: 1960, ‘Representation’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume.

  • Urmson, J. O.: 1988,Aristotle's Ethics (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. E.: 1991, ‘Finding an Apt Punishment for Tom Joad: (Re)Evaluating Tom Joad on the Basis of the PRA’,Journal for Social Philosophy 22(2).

  • Wilson, P. E.: 1993, ‘The Fiction of Corporate Scapegoating’,Journal of Business Ethics 12, 779–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wireback, T.: 1991, Telephone interview with P. Eddy Wilson.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

P. Eddy Wilson taught philosophy full time for two years after graduation at the University of the South and he was a participant in Peter French's 1990 NEH Summer Seminar. He is currently employed as a member of the Department of Philosophy and Religion of Shaw University to teach philosophy at their High Point CAPE Center in High Point, North Carolina. He is interested in philosophy of religion, process philosophy, and ethics. Two of his articles have been accepted for publication by theJournal of Social Philosophy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, P.E. Corporations, minors, and other innocents — A reply to R. E. Ewin. J Bus Ethics 13, 761–774 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876257

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876257

Keywords

Navigation