Skip to main content
Log in

The worlds of fiction and the worlds of science: A comparative study

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achinstein, P.: 1968,Concepts of Science, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, V. C.: 1963,Philosophy of Art, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1959,An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. J.: 1977,Perception, Theory and Commitment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. J.: 1983, ‘Response to Siegel’,Synthese 56, 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C.: 1973, ‘Modal Model Theory’, in A. R. D. Mathias and H. Rogers (eds.),Cambridge Summer School in Mathematical Logic (Lecture Notes in Mathematics 337), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 599–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M.: 1981,Designation, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S.: 1974, ‘Two Notes on Abstract Model Theory I’,Fundamenta Mathematica 82, 153–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1965, ‘Problems of Empiricism’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.),Beyond the Edge of Certainty, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 145–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, van B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1892, ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’,Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100, 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1984, ‘Epistemic Importance and Minimal Changes of Belief’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 136–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedymin, J.: 1981,Science and Convention, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1968,Languages of Art, Bobbs-Merrill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, R. E. (ed.): 1973,Theories and Observation in Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, B. and P. Gärdenfors: 1973, ‘A Guide to Intensional Semantics’, inModality, Morality and Other Problems of Sense and Nonsense, C. W. K. Gleerup, Lund, pp. 151–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydrich, W.: 1982, ‘Syntactic Fiction’,Poetics 11, 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1961, ‘Modality and Quantification’,Theoria 27, 119–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, J.: 1946,Meaning and Truth in the Arts, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1972,Naming and Necessity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1977,Progress and Its Problems, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1973,Counterfactuals, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1978, ‘Truth in Fiction’,American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J.: 1980,Art and Philosophy, The Harvester Press, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961,The Structure of Science, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1980, ‘Scientific Progress’,Synthese 45, 427–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: 1975, ‘A Meinongian Analysis in Fictional Objects’,Grazer Philosophische Studien 1, 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: 1980,Nonexistent Objects, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and V. Rantala: 1982a, ‘Realism and Formal Semantics’,Synthese 52, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D. and V. Rantala: 1982b, ‘Realism and Reference: Some Comments on Putnam’,Synthese 52, 439–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1905,Science and Hypothesis, The Science Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pörn, I.: 1977,Action Theory and Social Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A. N.: 1957,Time and Modality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1978, ‘Realism and Reason’, in H. Putnam (ed.),Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1980, ‘Models and Reality’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 45, 464–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantala, V.: 1985a, ‘Generating a Normative System’, in G. Holmström and A. J. I. Jones (eds.),Action, Logic and Social Theory (Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 38), Helsinki, pp. 272–81.

  • Rantala, V.: 1985b, ‘Knowledge and Intensionality’, in theProceedings of the Fourth Finnish-Soviet Logic Symposium, Telavi 1985, forthcoming.

  • Rantala, V.: forthcoming, ‘The Work of Art: Identity and Interpretation’.

  • Rantala, V.: 1989, ‘Possible Courses of Events’, in M. Kusch and M. Schröder (eds.),Text, Interpretation, Argumentation, Buske, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1980,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1905, ‘On Denoting’,Mind 14, 479–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1919,Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1969,Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1975, ‘The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse’,New Literary History VI.

  • Segerberg, K.: 1980, ‘Applying Modal Logic’,Studia Logica 39, 275–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1950, ‘On Referring’,Mind 59, 320–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1954, ‘A Reply to Mr. Sellars’,Philosophical Review 63, 216–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1977, ‘The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories’, in F. Suppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 3–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, S. K.: 1972, ‘Semantic Analysis of Tense Logic’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 37, 155–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1960,The Philosophy of Science, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R.: 1979, ‘Putnam's Realism’,Theoria 45, 114–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. J. F.: 1981,What Is Existence?, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, N.: 1980,Works and Worlds of Art, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rantala, V., Wiesenthal, L. The worlds of fiction and the worlds of science: A comparative study. Synthese 78, 53–86 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869681

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869681

Navigation